Location of Repository

Performance and views of examiners in the Applied Knowledge Test for the nMRCGP licensing examination

By Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Hilton Dixon, Carol Blow, Bill Irish and Paul Milne

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new computer-based Applied Knowledge Test (AKT) has been developed for the licensing examination for general practice administered by the Royal College of General Practitioners. AIM: The aim of this evaluation was to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and validity of the test as well as its transfer to a computerised format at local test centres. DESIGN OF STUDY: Computer-based test and postal questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Panel of examiners, Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners (MRCGP) examination, UK. METHOD: Self-administered postal questionnaires were sent to examiners not involved with the development of the test after completing it. Their performance scores were compared with those of candidates. RESULTS: The majority of participants (80.9%) were satisfied with the new computer-based test. Responses relating to content and attitudes to the test were also positive overall, but some problems with content were highlighted. Fewer examiners (61.9%) were positive about the physical comfort of the test centre, including seating, heating, and lighting. Examiners had significantly higher scores (mean 83.3%, range 69 to 93%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 81.9 to 84.7%) than 'real' candidates (mean 75.0%, range 45 to 94%, 95% CI = 74.6 to 75.5%), who subsequently took an identical test. CONCLUSION: The new computer-based licensing test (the AKT) was found to be acceptable to the majority of examiners. The pass-fail standard, determined by routine methods including an Angoff procedure, was supported by the higher success rate of examiners compared with candidates. The use of selected groups to assess high-stakes (licensing) examinations can be useful for assessing test validit

Topics: A300 Clinical Medicine, X300 Academic studies in Education
Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioner
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.3399/bjgp09X395111
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lincoln.ac.uk:2054
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/2... (external link)
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/2... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.