Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Objective evaluation of speech intelligibility for speech masked by time reversed masker processed from the target speech and the effects of its parameters

By Yue Wang, Philip Leistner and Ping Li

Abstract

Time-reversed masker processed from the target speech, which is different from other maskers because of its unsteadiness, has the highest masking efficiency. For time and economical reason, other than subjective measurement, appropriate objective measurements of speech intelligibility for speech masked by time reversed masker processed from the target speech should be considered. Four objective evaluation methods are analyzed in this paper to find which of them has the highest correlation with speech intelligibility of speech masked by time-reversed masker processed from the target speech in open-plan offices. Results showed that although STI has high correlation with speech intelligibility for masking speech by steady noise, it cannot represent the subjective speech intelligibility very well for masking speech by time reversed signal. A Short-Time Objective Intelligibility (STOI), Modified normalized covariance method (mNCM) and Perceptually Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ) all has high efficiency to predict speech intelligibility of speech masked by time-reversed masker processed from the target speech. We further applied STOI to investigate the effect of two parameters (reversed frame length and Target-to-Masker Ratio) in this masker on speech intelligibility. The experiment results showed that reversed frame length between 120ms and 240ms and Target-to-Masker Ratio lower than -5dB will lead to poor speech intelligibility

Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.3813/AAA.918564
OAI identifier: oai:fraunhofer.de:N-223351
Provided by: Fraunhofer-ePrints
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://publica.fraunhofer.de/d... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.