Location of Repository

Worker heterogeneity, new monopsony, and training

By A.L. Booth and Gylfi Zoega

Abstract

A worker's output depends not only on his/her own ability but also on that of colleagues, who can facilitate the performance of tasks that each individual cannot accomplish on his/her own. We show that this common-sense observation generates monopsony power and is sufficient to explain why employers might expend resources on training employees even when the training is of use to other firms. We show that training will take place in better-than-average or ‘good’ firms enjoying greater monopsony power, whereas ‘bad’ firms will have low-ability workers unlikely to receive much training

Topics: ems
Publisher: University of Iceland
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:3049

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1994). A Theoretical Model of On-the-job Training
  2. and Gylfi Zoega (2004), “Is Wage Compression a Necessary Condition for Firm-Financed General Training?” Oxford Economic Papers, doi
  3. (1993). Assignment Models of the Distribution of
  4. (2003). Classic Monopsony or New Monopsony? Searching for Evidence in Nursing Labor doi
  5. (1981). Firm-specific Human Capital as a Shared doi
  6. (2002). Hiring and Firing: A Tale of Two Thresholds,” doi
  7. (1993). How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence from Microdata, doi
  8. (1992). How to Count to doi
  9. (1996). Human Capital Investment under Asymmetric Information: The Pigovian Conjecture Revisited,” doi
  10. (2001). If You’re So Smart, Why Aren’t You Rich? Wage Inequality and Worker Heterogeneity,”
  11. (1981). Jacques-Francois Thisse and Yves Zenou (20000), “Wage Competition with Heterogeneous Workers and Firms,” doi
  12. (1962). Labor as a Quasi-fixed Factor,” doi
  13. (1999). Minimum Wages for Ronald McDonald Monopsonies: doi
  14. (1979). Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods,” doi
  15. (1999). Productivity Differences across Employers: The Roles of Employer Size, Age and Human Capital,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, doi
  16. (1981). Rank-order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts,” doi
  17. (1995). The German Apprenticeship System,”
  18. (1992). The O-Ring Theory of Economic Development,”
  19. (1996). Transferable Training and Poaching Externalities,” doi
  20. (1912). Wealth and Welfare, doi
  21. (2000). What We Know about Employer-provided Training: a Review of the Literature,” Cornell University, Center for Advanced Human Resources Studies Working Paper 96/09.
  22. (2002). Who Pays for General Training? Testing Some Predicitions for Human Capital Theory,”
  23. (1998). Why do Firms Train? Theory and Evidence,” doi
  24. (2000). Why do Temporary Help Firms Provide Free General Skills Training? Theory and Evidence,” doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.