Location of Repository

A Study on Integration of Computer Assisted\ud Instruction with a Traditional Teaching\ud Learning Process in the Area of Mechanical\ud Engineering Education

By Salah Madhi Ahmad Al-Hamad


This study presents the design, implementation and evaluation of a CAL package included in the teaching and learning methodology of CAD-CAM-CNC modules at Sheikh Khalefa Institute in Bahrain. The CAL package contains CAD tutorial, CAM tutorial and Power Point slides for CNC operations. The study has been carried in response to internal departmental audit which highlighted some issues which need to be dealt within the subject area of Mechanical engineering.\ud \ud \ud Three groups of students with similar pre-abilities (similar average marks and standard\ud deviations) were exposed to different teaching methodologies:\ud a) Traditional classroom lectures and laboratory sessions;\ud b) Classroom teaching including unsupervised computer simulation (hybrid learning approach)\ud c) Unsupervised CAD tutorials and supervised CAM-CNC computer simulation\ud The effectiveness of these three methods was determined by questionnaires (data collection\ud methods) completed by Lecturers and students. Their answers were analysed from quantitative\ud and qualitative points of view. The questionnaires were designed by taking into consideration the issues of reliability, validity and bias and concentrating on specific research questions. The Lecturers' questionnaires aim to find out Lecturers’ opinions about the various aspects of educational process. The students’ questionnaires intend to ascertain how well the CAD-CAMCNC modules meet the stated learning outcomes and to identify the main strengths and\ud weaknesses of various methods.\ud \ud \ud The students were assessed at the end of the term based on an engraving operation task which includes all elements of CAD-CAM-CNC operations. The author links the levels of cognition from Blooms’ taxonomy with the activities which should be completed by students. The quantitative and qualitative analysis of students’ marks versus learning ability indicators was performed and the results have been discussed.\ud \ud \ud The second evaluation method is based on quantitative analysis of the three groups of\ud students’ marks for assignments and exams. Also an analysis of time and material resources is\ud performed and the main conclusion was that the group of students taught with a combination of\ud CAL package and traditional method were more effective, efficient and satisfied with their\ud learning experiences. So the proposed hybrid learning method (CAI plus traditional teaching\ud method) is most suited for CAD-CAM-CNC teaching because the students find it easier and enjoyable to explore the subject area through various opportunities of learning

Topics: TJ, QA76
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:7058

Suggested articles



  1. ( 1998-1999) The process/outcome evaluation model: a conceptual framework for assessment. doi
  2. (1995). (Eds) Bloom’s Taxonomy and Critical Thinking Instruction: Recall is Not Knowledge. In:
  3. (2000). (Eds), Taxonomy for Learning, Teachingand Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
  4. (2003). A Computer Generated Pseudo-Experiment In Fluid Mechanics. doi
  5. (1999). A content analysis of general chemistry laboratory manuals for evidence of higherorder cognitive tasks. doi
  6. (2003). A hand Book for teaching &learning in higher Education- Enhancing academic practice 2nd Ed. .k & United State.
  7. (2000). A review of literature on effectiveness of use of information technology in education.
  8. (1995). Activating instruction: How to foster study and thinking skills in higher education, doi
  9. (1991). Advancements in Instructional Design Theory: Contextual Module Analysis and Integrated Instructional Strategies. doi
  10. (1998). An Investigation of the effect of individual cognitive preferences on learning through computer-based instruction. doi
  11. (2001). Analysis of student outcomes and attitudes in technologyenabled and traditional education: a case study.
  12. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments, doi
  13. (1995). Assessing sulfur status in lupins and wheat, doi
  14. (2002). Attitudes of engineering faculty towards technology assisted instruction - a polemic. J . of World Trans.
  15. (2009). Autodesk Inventor. [online] Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inventor_(computer_program).
  16. (2006). Based teacher Support tools to scale Up the ClassWide peer tutoring program. doi
  17. (2006). Blended Learning: the practicalities of implementation in a UK University. Current Development
  18. (1994). Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty-year Retrospective. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education. doi
  19. (2002). CAD/CAM Computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing. doi
  20. (1998). Computer-based graphics course and students’ cognitive skills. doi
  21. (1994). Design and Production of Multimedia and SimulationBased Learning Material. Netherlands Truman doi
  22. (1999). Doinf! Your Research Proiect. Milton Keynes:
  23. (2002). Education in structural timber design. doi
  24. (1979). Educational Research: An Introduction (third edition).
  25. (1999). Educational technology – an unstoppable force: a selective review of research into the effectiveness of educational media.
  26. (2004). Effective learning & teaching in engineering. 1st Ed. doi
  27. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: an updated analysis. doi
  28. (2006). Effectiveness Of Parallel And Serial Integration of Teaching Resources In Laboratory Teaching In Engineering Education International Journal Of Computer And Technology Volume 13, Number 6. pp.55-64 support@commongroundpublishing.com Abdulrasool
  29. (1999). Effects of hypermedia on students’ achievement: a meta-analysis. doi
  30. (2002). Enhancing good teaching practice in control education through hypermedia instruction and Web support. doi
  31. (1994). Final report of Bahrain National Commission for UNESCO. doi
  32. (2004). First year engineering students’ approaches to study.
  33. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: a review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control and style. doi
  34. (2003). Hypermedia Instruction and Learning Outcomes at Different Levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognitive Global
  35. (1998). Hypermedia systems for improving knowledge, understanding and skills in engineering degree courses. doi
  36. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility and the transfer of complex knowledge: an empirical investigation. doi
  37. (2006). ICTs: Teachers’ and students’ preconceptions and the implications for present and future teacher education.
  38. Implementing cognitive learning strategies in computer-based educational technology.
  39. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning,
  40. (2002). Instructional technology, learning styles and academic achievement.
  41. (2001). Interactive lecture in engineering education. doi
  42. (1996). Interactive teaching, doi
  43. (2001). Major Categories in the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives:
  44. Mayer.(1999) Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer. doi
  45. (1998). Modeling user navigation behaviours in a hypermedia-based learning system: an individual differences approach.
  46. (2005). Models for Web-based education: have we forgotten lessons learned?
  47. (1995). Multimedia courseware for teaching dynamic concepts: assessment of student learning. doi
  48. (2006). New Technologies in Classroom Design:
  49. (1999). Problems in the design of assessment led curricula. doi
  50. (1993). Reaching the second tier: learning and teaching styles in college science education.
  51. (1983). Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media. doi
  52. (2006). Research into student writing on computer: a qualitative and quantitative comparison between pen and paper and computer as modes of writing.
  53. (2000). Research Methods In Education. (fifth edition). London Routledgefalmer. doi
  54. (2001). Rethinking The Computer In Education. doi
  55. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professorate. doi
  56. (1956). Six level of Bloom Taxonomy htt://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm
  57. (2002). Student attitudes towards the use of hypermedia instruction and Web support in control education – a comparative study. doi
  58. (2001). Sustaining engineering as a discipline against present and future global technological change.
  59. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. doi
  60. Teaching Engineering. doi
  61. (2006). Teaching management information systems with blended learning methods: an experience with WebCT. doi
  62. (1965). The Conditions of Learning. doi
  63. (2002). The effect of individual learning styles on student outcomes in technology-enabled education.
  64. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes. doi
  65. (1995). The Efficiency of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI): A Meta- Analysis. doi
  66. (1997). The ffects of students’ computer-based prior experiences and instructional exposures on the application of hypermedia-related mental models doi
  67. (2000). The future of engineering education I: Avision for a new century.
  68. (2000). The future of engineering education IV: Learning how to teach.
  69. (2000). The future of engineering education V: Assessing teaching effectiveness and educational scholarship.
  70. (1997). The influence of a multimedia physics tutor and user differences on the development of scientific knowledge. doi
  71. (1995). The role of the student in learning from instruction,
  72. (2002). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Engineering,
  73. (1993). The Trouble with Learning Environments. doi
  74. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge: doi
  75. (2001). Transforming on-campus education: promise and peril of information technology in traditional universities. doi
  76. (1995). Twenty-one Guidelines for Effective Instructional Design.
  77. (1999). Using active instructional methods in lectures: A matter of skills and preferences, doi
  78. (1993). Weimer M.(1993) Improving Your Classroom Teaching( doi
  79. (1991). When Researchers Swim Upstream: Reflections on an Unpopular Argument About Learning from Media.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.