Location of Repository

Utopia revisited - or is it better the second time around?

By Angela Thody

Abstract

This article essays comparisons between nineteenth- and twentieth-century school management and its direction and control by central government. Its starting point is 1816 when Jeremy Bentham presented his utopian vision of a model school, to be managed by a school master exhibiting competences detailed in his Chrestomathic Table. This has similarities to the headteachers’ competences required in the late twentieth century by the government through the Teacher Training Agency. The article presents several areas for comparisons in addition to competences: definitions of effective management, governance and local community influence and the focus on quality assurance. Both periods have seen major changes in educational management and administration but will the lessons learnt from these innovations when first introduced in the nineteenth century be transferred to the late twentieth century

Topics: X370 Academic studies in Education (across phases), V320 Social History, V144 Modern History 1800-1899
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2000
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0022062000320204
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lincoln.ac.uk:1655

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1816) Chrestomathic Table II and p.26.
  2. (1883), 347 and 348.
  3. (1998). A historical study of the origins, concepts and development of School Boards
  4. A Schoolmaster's Difficulties
  5. (1977). Aspects of neglect: the strange case of Victorian popular education’, doi
  6. (1994). Cambs. England; inspection report (7-11
  7. (1882). Circular to HMI,
  8. Committee of the Privy Council for Education, doi
  9. (1998). Core module - Strategic Leadership and Accountability,
  10. example, the School Leadership and Management Series from Pitmans (Financial Times Publishing), edited by Brent Davies and John West-Burnham. These routinely have sales around 2,000 for each title.
  11. (1997). External Inspections, ‘Failing Schools’ and the Role of Governing Bodies’, doi
  12. (1973). Factories, monitorial schools and Jeremy Bentham: the origins of the 'management syndrome' in popular education', doi
  13. Four Periods of Public Education as reviewed in 1832-1839-1846-1862
  14. (1980). Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Schools in England and Wales, doi
  15. (1985). Jude the Obscure
  16. (1998). Partnership: lessons from the past’ in K.Stott
  17. Principle I ‘relative to the Official Establishment: i.e. to the quality and functions of the Persons by whom the performance of the [instruction] is to be directed.
  18. Principle III having for their special object, the securing of the forthcomingness of Evidence viz. in the most correct, complete, durable and easily accessible shape: and thereby the most constant and universal notoriety of all past matters of fact.
  19. (1996). Public Libraries Legislation and Educational Provision in Nineteenth-Century England’, doi
  20. (1885). Quite a number ran to several editions, for example, C.G. Collins (3rd Ed) Notes on School Management (London, Moffat
  21. Reengineering and Total Quality in Schools
  22. (1908). Some Passages in the life of one of H.M.
  23. Taylor (1834), iii. Teaching as a relief from the workhouse seems to have resurfaced; in 1998, the British government suggested that unemployed young people should be used in schools as classroom assistants.
  24. (1997). Teacher Training Agency doi
  25. (1997). Teacher Training Agency, National Standards for Headteachers
  26. (1998). Teachers should get paid on merit, says MP’,
  27. (1982). The history of education and the study of educational administration’, doi
  28. (1908). writing of 1872,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.