Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Rights and Development-Induced Displacement: Is it a case of risk management or social protection?

By Behrooz Morvaridi

Abstract

Irrespective of the regional setting, displacement of all kinds results in considerable disruption and loss of assets for both the individual and the collective, with greater likelihood of socio-economic impoverishment and reduced access to rights entitlements. Although there is evidence that displaced people face additional challenges of life in a new environment, living day to day with uncertainties around their survival, the larger proportion of these studies are concerned with physical resettlement and the livelihood restoral of people displaced as a result of conflict or large development projects (whether as refugees or internally displaced people (IDP). There has been relatively little critical reflection on how the policy framework can deliver the rights and entitlements of forced migrants, including those who should be obliged to protect them and the relevance of individual agency . This paper critically engages with current internal displacement protection policies that are based on risk management or short-term relief measures. It considers how a policy paradigm of social protection might offer a framework to minimize the loss of rights so often associated with displacement

Topics: Livelihoods,, Rights, Displacement, Development policy
Publisher: Bradford Centre for International Development
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:bradscholars.brad.ac.uk:10454/3030
Provided by: Bradford Scholars

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). Displacement, Risks and Resistance: Local Perceptions and Actions doi
  2. (2004). Dissolving the public realm? The logics and limits of neoliberalism’, doi
  3. Evaluate and Policy Analysis Unit
  4. (2003). For a New Economics of Resettlement: A Sociological Critique of the Compensation Principle, Paper presented at Cornell University. doi
  5. (2000). Globalisation, Humanitarianism and the Erosion of Refugee Protection, doi
  6. (2005). Governance, Forced Migration and Welfare, doi
  7. (2005). Human Rights and Human Responsibilities, in Kuper, A (ed.) Global Responsibilities: Who must deliver on Human Rights? doi
  8. (1990). Involuntary Resettlement, Operational Directive No. 4.30 and revised Operation Directive 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement procedures, World Bank: doi
  9. (2002). Nets, Ropes, Ladders and Trampolines: The Place of Social Protection Within current doi
  10. Poverty and Neo Liberal Bias doi
  11. (1999). Stakeholders Attitudes to Involuntary Resettlement in the Context of the Ilisu Dam Project Turkey, Export Credits Guarantee Department: London Harrell
  12. (2000). The Ilisu Dam and HEPP, Resettlement Action Plan, Final Report,
  13. (2003). Towards A Sociology of Forced Migration Social Transformation, doi
  14. (2000). World Commission on Dam

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.