Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Engaging the Small Firm in Learning: practice based theorising on complex social knowledge in the SME Firm

By David Higgins


The concept of organisational learning has experienced a huge growth in the last decade, both in academic and business domains. The rationale for the development and growth of material in this area can be attributed to the changing dynamics of the business world, coupled with the extensive analytical value of organisational learning in contributing to the development of understanding the SME firm and their activities, (McElroy, 2003). The SME firm and its management process are quite contextually specific and are dependent or related to a wider number of factors making it difficult to specifically and rationally identify learning criteria which would allow and enable for the development of a learning environment. The paper sets out to suggest that knowledge in the SME enterprise is embodied as evident in such notions as tacit knowing and learning, and embedded grounded in the situated social historic contexts of individual lives and work. This supports the view that the nature of knowledge is inherently indeterminate and continually evolving. \ud \ud \ud Current academic literature has widely acknowledged that the SME enterprise learns through action oriented processes, and much of this learning is context dependent and experientially based. Firm learning can be conceived as something else which develops primarily through activities such as complex problem solving, experimentation, and simply learning by mistakes such events in these firms occur informally in a ad-hoc manner, and as a result it seems that learning in the SME firm occurs through opportunistic moments, incidentally facilitated by other workers or the owner/manager in the firm. Such a focus on firm knowledge and knowing is particularly appropriate in the consideration of the demands which have been placed on the small firm to be innovative and creative, especially in competitive environments, where the development and delivery of new services and products is of huge importance. The paper seeks to extend the current conceptualisations of organisational learning by considering how a practice based perspective of knowledge is useful in this regard. In this perspective, learning is no longer equated with the appropriation or diffusions of pieces of knowledge, but rather it is viewed as the development of situated identities based on participation in a process of social engagement and interaction. This provides an alternative to the dominant cognitive models, which considers learning as an individual process, where the individual is someone who processes information and modifies their mental structure as a result

Topics: HD
Publisher: ISBE
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:
Downloaded from

Suggested articles


  1. (1994). (eds) Organisational Learning,
  2. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of doi
  3. (2003). Accessing Local Knowledge: Policy Analysis and Communities of Meaning’. doi
  4. (1947). Administrative Behaviour. doi
  5. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. doi
  6. (1962). Being and Time, trans. doi
  7. (1991). Bounded Rationality and Organisational Learning' doi
  8. (1999). Bridging Epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. doi
  9. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life, doi
  10. (2000). Communities of Practice, Foucault and Actor Network Theory”, doi
  11. (2000). Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier’, Harvard Business Review (January–February):
  12. (2004). Constructing Contributions to Organisational Learning: Argyris and the New Generation' doi
  13. (1999). Culture and Organizational Learning: Toward Pluralism’,
  14. (1996). Culture and Organizational Learning’ doi
  15. (2002). Experiential Learning and Its Critics: Preserving the Role of doi
  16. (1999). In Search of a Social Learning Theory’, doi
  17. (1998). Individual and Organizational Learning at the Executive Level. doi
  18. (1989). Industry recipes: The nature and sources of managerial judgement. doi
  19. (2003). Introduction: Towards a Practice-Based View of Knowing and Learning in Organisations',
  20. (2003). Knowing in Organizations. A Practice-Based Approach. doi
  21. (2002). Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. doi
  22. (2001). Knowledge and Organization: A Socialpractice Perspective’, doi
  23. (1996). Knowledge and the Firm: Overview’, doi
  24. (1993). Knowledge and the Theory of Organisations—Organisations as Activity Systems and the Reframing of Management' doi
  25. (1993). Knowledge and the theory of organizations: organizations doi
  26. (2006). Modes of Knowing in Practice: The Relationship Between Learning and Knowledge Revisited',
  27. (1979). Organisational Learning: Implications for Organisational Design',
  28. (1988). Organisational Learning' doi
  29. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities-ofPractice: Toward a Unified View of Working, doi
  30. (1999). Organizational Learning: Current Debates and Opportunities’, doi
  31. (2000). Organizational Learning: Debates Past, Present and Future’, doi
  32. (2000). Practice-based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations’ doi
  33. (2000). Seeing Organizational Learning: A Cultural View’ doi
  34. (1991). Situated Learning. doi
  35. Small and medium enterprise development: Borrowing from elsewhere? A comment on Allan Gibb’s paper . doi
  36. (1987). Teaching artistry through reflection-in-action. In Educating the reflective practitioner
  37. (2003). The Facilitating Factors for Organizational Learning: Bringing Ideas from doi
  38. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. doi
  39. (2003). The Future of Knowledge. doi
  40. (2002). The Justifiction of Knowledge: Tracking the Translation of Quality”,
  41. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Create the Dynamics of Innovation. doi
  42. (2003). The New Knowledge Management. doi
  43. (1986). The Power of Association’,
  44. (2006). The Relationship Between Individual and Organizational Learning: New Evidence from Managerial Learning Practices ', doi
  45. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial.
  46. (1966). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge.
  47. (1995). The theory of the growth of the firm, rev. edn. doi
  48. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in doi
  49. (2000). To Transfer is to Transform: The Circulation of Safety Knowledge’, doi
  50. (1998). Toward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organisations' doi
  51. (1998). Toward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations’, doi
  52. (1987). Understanding Computers and Cognition.
  53. (2000). Using a life-story approach in research entrepreneurial learning: the development of a conceptual model and its implications in the design of learning experiences”, doi
  54. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge. doi
  55. (2001). What is organizational knowledge?', doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.