Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Complexity Theory and the Role of Knowledge Management in the Knowledge-Based Small Business

By David Higgins and Alan Southern

Abstract

The paper aims to contribute to our understanding of the knowledge creation process in the knowledge-based small business. The authors consider how a complexity science perspective of knowledge is useful in this regard. So for example, the complexity of knowledge creation might be seen as systemic as no one individual knowledge agent can operate in an isolated and self-sufficient manner. Additionally, the social structures of the small business involve relations and patterns of behaviour that have become established across time and space. This idea that knowledge is socially and culturally situated lends itself to a qualitative interpretation of the processes evident in the small business.\ud \ud \ud By drawing on pilot evidence propositions about facilitating knowledge creation as both an individual and collective knowledge appear to co-emerge. This is consistent with the idea that knowledge develops as a process of interaction, as opposed to a managed process and further as Tsoukas (1996) suggests, knowledge in the small business is a socially constructed understanding derived from the interplay between tacit and explicit practices and processes. We seek to examine whether individual knowledge agents exists in a network of relations that are complex and dynamic and if so, reflect on what the boundaries to those networks might be. This supports the view that the nature of knowledge is inherently indeterminate and continually evolving. Further thought on how knowledge and knowing is emergent and produced and reproduced in recurrent social practices allow the authors to reject any ideas that knowledge is static or created as a predetermined outcome. The authors conclude the paper by suggesting knowledge in the small business is embodied as evident in such notions as tacit knowing and learning, and embedded grounded in the situated social historic contexts of individual lives and work

Topics: HD
Publisher: Academic Conferences
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:7820

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). (Eds),Organizations as Knowledge Systems: Knowledge, Learning and Dynamic Capabilities, doi
  2. (2005). Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. doi
  3. (2003). Complexity and the Dilemma of the Two Worlds: The Dynamics of Navigating Fantasyland”, doi
  4. (1993). Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge. doi
  5. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. doi
  6. (2003). Entrepreneurial learning and critical reflection. doi
  7. (1999). Explaining organizational dynamics", doi
  8. (2001). H.(2001) Knowledge, purpose and process: linking knowledge management and innovation System Sciences, doi
  9. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity, Perseus Books, doi
  10. (1986). Images of organisation. doi
  11. (2003). Knowledge Management tolls. doi
  12. (2002). Knowledge-based View: A New Theory of Strategy?'. In: doi
  13. (2001). Learning orientations and growth in smaller firms. doi
  14. (1996). Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm', doi
  15. (1992). Management and leadership as relational phenomena", in
  16. (1996). Manufacturing the Employee. Sage,
  17. (2001). Narrative Methods for Organisational and Communication Research,
  18. (2004). Organisation Theory and Design.
  19. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities-of-practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation', doi
  20. (2002). Organizational learning and entrepreneurial strategy. doi
  21. (2001). Patterns of interactive learning in a high-tech region. doi
  22. (1996). Perspectives on innovation in organizations", doi
  23. (1999). Size of investment, opportunity choice and human resources in new venture growth. doi
  24. (2004). Small firm internationalization and business strategy: an exploratory study of ‘knowledge-intensive’ and ‘traditional’ manufacturing firms in the UK. doi
  25. (2001). SME and large organisation perceptions of knowledge management: comparisons and contrasts. doi
  26. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. doi
  27. (1996). The Firm as a Distributed Knowledge System: A Constructionist Approach. doi
  28. (1994). The Quark and the Jaguar. doi
  29. (2002). Types of Knowledge and their roles in technology transfer.
  30. (1982). Varieties of qualitative research. Studying organisations: Innovations in methodology.
  31. (2003). Why is Negentropy, like Phlogiston, a Privative?”, International Nonlinear Science Conference,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.