Location of Repository

Academic library non/low use and undergraduate student achievement: a preliminary report of research in progress

By Deborah Goodall and David Pattern

Abstract

Purpose: Reports an ongoing investigation of library use at Huddersfield University that has identified a historical correlation between Library usage and degree classification.\ud \ud \ud Approach: Three sets of data - use of electronic resources, book loans, and visits to the library – when represented graphically show consistent amounts of no and low use at campus, academic school, degree-type and course level. Combining these findings with data showing academic achievement raises the question: is there a positive correlation between library use and attainment? \ud \ud \ud Findings: Understandably Library usage varies between academic schools and there are often pedagogic reasons for low usage, but it would appear that, in some subjects, students who ‘read’ more, measured in terms of borrowing books and accessing electronic resources, achieve better grades. \ud \ud \ud Limitations: Further work will focus on undergraduate, fulltime students at the main University campus.\ud \ud \ud Implications: The research intends to discover the reasons behind non/low use so as to develop then trial effective interventions for improving the grades of all students, from the bottom up, rather than just supporting those that are already high flyers. The results will inform both Library service delivery and University goals concerning the quality of the student learning experience, improving retention and improving the level of final degree award.\ud \ud \ud Originality: There are implications for all subjects and all levels of achievement at the University

Topics: Z665, ZA4050, LB2300
Publisher: Emerald
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:7940

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2005). An attempt to quantify the quality of student bibliographies”, doi
  2. (2007). Garbage in, garbage out: the effect of library instruction on the quality of students’ term papers”,
  3. (2009). I’ve stuck to the path I’m afraid’: exploring student non-use of blended learning”, doi
  4. (2002). Impacts & outcomes: searching for the most elusive indicators of academic library performance”, in Meaningful measures for emerging realities.
  5. (1986). Library anxiety: a grounded theory and its development”, doi
  6. (2010). Maximising use of library resources at the University of Huddersfield”, presented at
  7. (2008). Reading for a degree: creating an Anglia Ruskin Reading Strategy. Report of the
  8. (2007). Return on investment: libraries and student retention”, doi
  9. (1998). Story telling: is it really research?”, doi
  10. (1974). Students and Books, Routledge and Kegan Paul,
  11. (2008). Telling the story: qualitative approaches to measuring the performance of emerging library services”, doi
  12. (2005). The role of effective intervention in promoting the value of electronic information services in the learning process”, doi
  13. (2009). The Survey of American College Students: Student Library Research Practices & Skills”, available at: http://www.primaryresearch.com/release-200906251.html(accessed 4
  14. (2004). Users and user study methodology: the JUBILEE project”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.