Location of Repository

Understanding community policing

By Peter Somerville

Abstract

Purpose\ud The purpose of the paper is to explore, in broad terms, how policing needs to be developed in communities today.\ud \ud Approach\ud The approach is normative and analytical, considering the meaning of policing in general, and community policing in particular, and specifying the criteria that such policing has to satisfy in order to be fair and effective in contemporary society.\ud \ud Findings\ud A concept of public self-policing is developed and community policing is then evaluated in the light of this concept. Police officers are understood as street-level bureaucrats, with multiple accountabilities. The ideal relationship between police and public is characterised as a structural coupling between two types of self-organising system. \ud \ud Implications\ud The paper has implications for how policing organisations and governments might develop improved policing strategies in the future.\ud \ud Value of the paper\ud The paper provides a clear, logical summary of thinking about the role of policing, particularly community policing, in today’s society. It offers a novel concept of public self-policing, leading to a new approach to the evaluation of the work of policing organisations

Topics: L900 Others in Social studies
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1108/13639510910958172
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lincoln.ac.uk:2305

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2000). It’s good to talk but it’s not good enough: active consultation as a key to safer communities’,
  2. (2004). Place and parenting: A study of four communities, London: Institute for the Study of Children, Families and Social Issues,
  3. (1994). Police for the future: Studies in crime and public policy,
  4. (2000). Enduring issues in criminology,
  5. (2002). Environmental criminology’,
  6. (1982). Justice and politics in people’s China: legal order or continuing revolution? doi
  7. (2005). Community policing: National and international models and approaches, doi
  8. (2004). Anti-social behaviour, crime control and social control’, doi
  9. (1993). Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Crime Control, doi
  10. (2004). Integrating sociological research and theory with community-oriented policing: bridging the gap between academics and practice. Available at:
  11. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach’, doi
  12. (1994). Understanding community policing: A framework for action, doi
  13. (1998). Problem-oriented policing vs. zero tolerance’, in T. O’Connor Shelly and A.C. Grant (eds), Problem-oriented policing: Crime-specific patterns, critical issues and making
  14. (1997). The local governance of crime: Appeals to community and partnerships, doi
  15. (2003). Contractual governance” of deviant behaviour’, doi
  16. (2004). The extended policing family: Visible patrols in residential areas, doi
  17. (2005). Plural policing: The mixed economy of visible patrols in England & doi
  18. (2002). Recent developments in restorative justice for young people in England and Wales’, doi
  19. (2002). Return of the governors: citizenship and the new governance of neighbourhood disorder in the UK’, doi
  20. (2006). Citizen empowerment strategies and anti-social behaviour policy in the UK’, TGéographie,
  21. (1988). Community policing and foot patrol: issues of theory and evaluation’,
  22. (1997). Mean streets: Youth crime and homelessness, Cambridge: doi
  23. (2005). Social capital, doi
  24. (2001). Community, crime and disorder: Safety and regeneration in urban neighbourhoods, doi
  25. (2006). Respect in the neighbourhood: Why neighbourliness matters, Lyme Regis: doi
  26. (2003). Policing tactics and perceptions of police legitimacy’, doi
  27. (1995). Private, parochial and public social orders: the problem of crime and incivility in urban communities’, in R. Kasinitz (ed) Metropolis: Centre and symbol of our times,
  28. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability’, doi
  29. (1961). The death and life of great American cities: The failure of town planning, Harmondsworth:
  30. (2002). The transformation of policing’, doi
  31. (2005). Over-policed, under-protected and tarred with the same brush: exclusion and the desire for security during regeneration’, paper presented to conference on Securing the Renaissance: Policing, Community and Disorder in Glasgow,
  32. (1988). The rhetoric of community policing’, in J.R.Greene and S.D. Mastrowski (eds), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality, doi
  33. (2003). Governing as governance, doi
  34. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? doi
  35. et al (2002) Promoting intervention against violent crime: A social identity approach, Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council. Available at:
  36. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services, doi
  37. (2006). Plural policing, local communities and the market in visible patrols’, in
  38. (2000). Plural policing and democratic governance’, doi
  39. (1999). The politics of community policing: Rearranging the power to punish, Ann Arbor: doi
  40. (2004). Some observations concerning a theory of democratic policing. Available at:
  41. (1988). Community policing as reform: a cautionary tale’, in
  42. (1995). Law enforcement in a time of community policing’, doi
  43. (2000). Informality: Social theory and contemporary practice, doi
  44. (1998). Community-Oriented Policing: A Systemic Approach to Policing, Prentice-Hall. Inc, Upper Saddle River,
  45. (2000). Communities in the balance? The reality of social exclusion on housing estates,
  46. (2007). Is neighbourhood policing related to informal social control?’ Policing: An doi
  47. (1986). The problem housing estate, doi
  48. (2000). Community policing: Origins, elements, implementation, assessment,
  49. (1998). The prevention of crime: Social and situational strategies,
  50. (2004). Policing race and racism, doi
  51. (2002). Assessing the relationship between police-community coproduction and neighborhood-level social capital’, doi
  52. (2008). Systems thinking in the public sector, doi
  53. (2004). Crime prevention: Facts, fallacies and the future.
  54. (2004). Exploring community responses to drugs,
  55. (1984). The role of bystanders in crime control’, doi
  56. (2004). Sources of informal social control in Chicago neighborhoods’, doi
  57. (2004). Reassurance policing: an evaluation of the local management of community safety, Home Office Research Study 288, London: Home Office.
  58. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods, doi
  59. (1994). The impact of neighbourhood policing on neighborhood residents: a cross-site analysis’, in D.P. Rosenbaum (ed), The challenge of community policing: Testing the promises, Thousand Oaks, doi
  60. (1997). Community policing, Chicago style, doi
  61. (2009). The feeling’s mutual”: respect as the basis for co-operative interaction’, in A. Millie (ed) Securing respect: behavioural expectations and anti-social behaviour in the UK, doi
  62. (2008). Communities, identities and crime, doi
  63. (2002). Keeping up appearances: a community’s perspective on community policing and the local governance of crime’, doi
  64. (1999). Zero tolerance or community tolerance? doi
  65. (2000). Community policing in comparative context: PRC vs. USA, available at: HTUwww.polizeinewsletter.de/documents/Community_PolicinginChWong.pdfUTH.
  66. (1996). Why police organizations change: A study of community-oriented policing,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.