Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Longer fixation duration while viewing face images

By Kun Guo, Sasan Mahmoodi, Robert Robertson and Malcolm Young

Abstract

The spatio-temporal properties of saccadic eye movements can be influenced by the cognitive demand and the characteristics of the observed scene. Probably due to its crucial role in social communication, it is argued that face perception may involve different cognitive processes compared with non-face object or scene perception. In this study, we investigated whether and how face and natural scene images can influence the patterns of visuomotor activity. We recorded monkeys’ saccadic eye movements as they freely viewed monkey face and natural scene images. The face and natural scene images attracted similar number of fixations, but viewing of faces was accompanied by longer fixations compared with natural scenes. These longer fixations were dependent on the context of facial features. The duration of fixations directed at facial contours decreased when the face images were scrambled, and increased at the later stage of normal face viewing. The results suggest that face and natural scene images can generate different patterns of visuomotor activity. The extra fixation duration on faces may be correlated with the detailed analysis of facial features

Topics: C800 Psychology, C850 Cognitive Psychology, C830 Experimental Psychology
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s00221-005-0248-y
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lincoln.ac.uk:2425

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.
  2. (1992). Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. Brain 115: 15-36 Simoncelli EP, Olshausen BA (2001) Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 1193-1216 Tanaka K
  3. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. doi
  4. (2004). N170 or N1? Spatialtemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebr Cortex 14: 132-142 Jacobs AM doi
  5. (1997). Res 76:181-189 Fellous JM
  6. (1998). Social stimuli and social rewards in primate learning and cognition. Behav Process 42: 159-175 Andrew RJ doi
  7. (1981). Stimulus processing during eye fixation. doi
  8. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cognit Sci 6:255-260 doi
  9. (1999). Trends Cognit Sci 7:498-504 Henderson JM, Hollingworth A

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.