Location of Repository

Drivers for change in primary care of diabetes following a protected learning time educational event: interview study of practitioners

By A. Niroshan Siriwardena, Jo B. Middlemass, Kate Ward and Carol Wilkinson

Abstract

Background: A number of protected learning time schemes have been set up in primary care across the United Kingdom but there has been little published evidence of their impact on processes of care. We undertook a qualitative study to investigate the perceptions of practitioners\ud involved in a specific educational intervention in diabetes as part of a protected learning time scheme for primary health care teams, relating to changing processes of diabetes care in general practice.\ud Methods: We undertook semistructured interviews of key informants from a sample of practices stratified according to the extent they had changed behaviour in prescribing of ramipril and diabetes care more generally, following a specific educational intervention in Lincolnshire, United Kingdom. Interviews sought information on facilitators and barriers to change in organisational behaviour for\ud the care of diabetes.\ud Results: An interprofessional protected learning time scheme event was perceived by some but not all participants as bringing about changes in processes for diabetes care. Participants cited examples of change introduced partly as a result of the educational session. This included using ACE\ud inhibitors as first line for patients with diabetes who developed hypertension, increased use of aspirin, switching patients to glitazones, and conversion to insulin either directly or by referral to secondary care. Other reported factors for change, unrelated to the educational intervention, included financially driven performance targets, research evidence and national guidance. Facilitators for change linked to the educational session were peer support and teamworking supported by audit and comparative feedback.\ud Conclusion: This study has shown how a protected learning time scheme, using interprofessional learning, local opinion leaders and early implementers as change agents may have influenced changes in systems of diabetes care in selected practices but also how other confounding factors\ud played an important part in changes that occurred in practice

Topics: B210 Pharmacology, B710 Community Nursing, A300 Clinical Medicine
Publisher: Biomed Central
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-4
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lincoln.ac.uk:2432

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2006). Administration and clerical staff perceptions and experiences of protected learning time: a focus group study. Quality in Primary Care
  2. (2002). Cluster randomised controlled trial of an educational outreach visit to improve influenza and pneumococcal immunisation rates in primary care.
  3. (1995). Diffusion of innovations 4th ed edition.
  4. (1998). Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. doi
  5. (1999). DP: A framework for effective management of change in clinical practice: dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care doi
  6. (2002). Evaluation of 'TARGET' in Portsmouth: T time for A audit, R reflection, G guidelines, E education and T training. Education for Primary Care
  7. (2004). Evaluation of protected learning time in a primary care trust. Quality in Primary Care
  8. (2002). H: A critical review of evaluations of interprofessional education. Volume Occasional Paper No. 2. King's College, London, Learning and Teaching Support Network, Centre for Health Sciences and Practice;
  9. (1999). Howe A: Recommendations for future studies: a systematic review of educational interventions in primary care settings.
  10. (2006). Iacovou N: Evaluating the impact on practice of a West of Berkshire protected learning time initiative in primary care. Education for Primary Care
  11. (1992). Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Qual doi
  12. (2006). Investigation of the effect of a countywide protected learning time scheme on prescribing rates of ramipril: interrupted time series study. Family Practice doi
  13. (1992). PD: Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change.
  14. (1996). Perkoff GT: Effect of physician profiling on utilization. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. doi
  15. (1997). Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ doi
  16. (2006). Practice managers' perceptions and experiences of protected learning time: a focus group study. Quality in Primary Care
  17. (2000). Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators: Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Lancet doi
  18. (2005). Protected learning time in general practice: a question of relevance. Education for Primary Care
  19. (1989). Roberto E: Social marketing. Strategies for changing public behaviour doi
  20. (1999). Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (Review protocol). Edited by: Software U. Oxford, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Collaboration; doi
  21. (1990). The adult learner : a neglected species 4th ed. edition. Houston ; London : Gulf Pub.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.