Location of Repository

Should the Quality and Outcomes Framework be abolished? No

By A. Niroshan Siriwardena


Head to Head: Steve Gillam (doi:10.1136/bmj.c2710) argues that the general practice pay for performance scheme is not good value for money, but Niroshan Siriwardena (doi:10.1136/bmj.c2794) believes it needs to be improved not remove

Topics: A300 Clinical Medicine
Publisher: BMJ Publishing
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1136/bmj.c2794
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lincoln.ac.uk:2619

Suggested articles



  1. A review of the public health impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework. doi
  2. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. doi
  3. Developing QOF indicators and the concept of Qofability.
  4. (2007). Doctor behaviour under a pay for performance contract: evidence from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (last accessed 12/03/2010).
  5. Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes framework. doi
  6. Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. doi
  7. Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians. doi
  8. Final report for the Information Centre for Health and Social Care: time series analysis for 2001-2006 for selected clinical indicators from the QOF. QResearch .
  9. Financial incentives to improve the quality of primary care in the UK: predicting the consequences of change. doi
  10. Future of quality measurement. doi
  11. (2008). holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract. Sociol Health Illn doi
  12. How to identify when a performance indicator has run its course. doi
  13. It's about more than money: financial incentives and internal motivation. doi
  14. Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom. doi
  15. (2010). Measuring performance and missing the point? doi
  16. Quality of clinical primary care and targeted incentive payments: an observational study.
  17. Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. doi
  18. Research learning from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework: a review of existing research. doi
  19. Siriwardena AN. A unifying theory of clinical practice: Relationship, Diagnostics, Management and professionalism (RDM-p).
  20. smoke and mirrors?
  21. Strengthening primary care: addressing the disparity between vertical and horizontal investment. doi
  22. The association between the quality of epilepsy management in primary care, general practice population deprivation status and epilepsy-related emergency hospitalisations. doi
  23. The impact of QOF on practice organisation and service delivery: summary of evidence from two qualitative studies.
  24. The Quality and Outcomes Framework: what have you done to yourselves?
  25. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. doi
  26. Value for money and the Quality and Outcomes Framework in primary care in the UK NHS. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.