Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A comparative analysis of the effects of instructional design factors on student success in e-learning: multiple-regression versus neural networks

By Halil Ibrahim Cebeci, Harun Resit Yazgan and Abdulkadir Geyik


This study explores the relationship between the student performance and instructional design. The research was conducted at the E-Learning School at a university in Turkey. A list of design factors that had potential influence on student success was created through a review of the literature and interviews with relevant experts. From this, the five most import design factors were chosen. The experts scored 25 university courses on the extent to which they demonstrated the chosen design factors. Multiple regression and supervised artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to examine the relationship between student grade point averages and the scores on the five design factors. The results indicated that there is no statistical difference between the two models. Both models identified the use of examples and applications as the most influential factor. The ANN model provided more information and was used to predict the course-specific factor values required for a desired level of success

Topics: T Technology (General), LB Theory and practice of education, LC Special aspects of education
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09687760802649889
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1999). A comparison of conventional linear regression methods and neural networks for forecasting educational spending. doi
  2. (2002). A comparison of online text and subject video in relation to learning strategy.
  3. (2001). A meta-analytic review of factors that influence the effectiveness of webbased training within the context of distance learning. PhD diss.,
  4. (2002). An investigation of the connections between adult student success, satisfaction, and learning preferences and usable interface design of web based educational resources. PhD diss.,
  5. (2003). Artificial neural networks.
  6. (2005). Caught in the web of quality. doi
  7. (1999). CD/Web Hybrids: delivering multimedia to the online learner.
  8. (2004). Comparison between traditional methods and artificial neural networks for ammonia concentration forecasting in an eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) intensive rearing system. doi
  9. (2000). Comparison of student characteristics, and evaluation of student success, in an online health education course.
  10. (2004). Comparison of the performance of multi-layer perceptron and linear regression for epidemiological data. doi
  11. (2004). Comparison of the performance of multi-layer perceptron and linear regression for epidemiological data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 44: 547–70.ALT-J, Research doi
  12. (2003). Connection between multi-layer perceptrons and regression using independent component analysis. doi
  13. (2001). Critical success factors for on-line course resources. doi
  14. (2003). Designing web-based instruction: A research review on colour, typography, layout, and screen density.
  15. (2001). Differential cognitive processing of text and graphically presented items in an on-line testing environment. PhD diss.,
  16. (1998). Distance learning: Success barriers and strategies for students and faculty.
  17. (2008). Does the amount of on-screen text influence student learning from a multimedia-based instructional unit? doi
  18. (2007). Evaluation of alternate multimedia for web-based asynchronous learning. doi
  19. (2006). Examining the effects of text-only and text-and-visual instructional materials on the achievement of field-dependent and field-independent learners during problem-solving with modeling software. doi
  20. (1991). Identifying predictors of high risk among community college telecourse students. doi
  21. (2003). Internet-assisted versus traditional distance learning environments: Factors affecting students’ preferences. doi
  22. (1994). Introduction to the theory of neural computation. doi
  23. (2004). Investigation of factors affecting students’ satisfaction with online course components. PhD diss.,
  24. (2001). Learning via computer: Design development and methods.
  25. (2002). Online learning: Student and environmental factors and their relationship to secondary school student success in online courses. PhD diss.,
  26. (1994). Predicting graduate student success: A comparison of neural networks and traditional techniques. doi
  27. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. doi
  28. (2004). Preparing for distance learning: designing an online student orientation course.
  29. (1999). Screen design guidelines for motivation in interactive multimedia instruction: A survey and framework for designers.
  30. (2006). Student characteristics for online learning success. doi
  31. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. doi
  32. (1999). The effects of internet-based instruction on student learning.
  33. (2003). The web-based community college student: An examination of factors that lead to success and risk. doi
  34. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. doi
  35. (2006). Web-based distance learning technology: The impacts of web module length and format.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.