Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Eighteenth-century Quakerism and the rehabilitation of James Nayler, seventeenth-century radical

By Erin Bell


Although the first Quakers aligned with history superfluous tradition, detrimental to true appreciation of the inward voice of God, by the early eighteenth century they had produced their first histories as a defence against Anglican allegations of continued disorder and enthusiasm. At the same time, pressure to publish the collected works of James Nayler, a convicted blasphemer, proved particularly contentious. Leo Damrosch has sought to understand what Nayler thought he was doing in the 1650s; this study considers what motivated later Quakers to censor his works and accounts of his life, and demonstrates how English Friends in particular sought to revise the popular image of Quakerism by rewriting history

Topics: V143 Modern History 1700-1799, V142 Modern History 1600-1699, V620 Religious studies, V330 History of Religions
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2008
DOI identifier: 10.1017/S0022046907002230
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.