Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Home is where the heart lies? A study of false address giving to police

By Jason Roach


Purpose\ud \ud The purpose of the present paper is to identify the cognitive processes associated with the construction of a false address, and explore how this can be used to identify and trace those who give a false address to police. It is hypothesized that most people find it difficult to spontaneously fabricate an entire false address. As a consequence they provide identifiable clues as to the real address being concealed. \ud \ud Methods\ud \ud A quasi-experimental research design was employed where 142 students were first asked to generate a false address and second to analyse it to ascertain how random they considered it to be. \ud \ud Results\ud \ud Participants, overwhelmingly, stated that the false addresses generated contained elements of truth which could be used to identify their real place of residence. Although most participants appeared capable of generating bona fide false postcodes, comparison with an official UK postcode list identified over 60% did not actually exist. \ud \ud Conclusion\ud \ud People generally rely on pre-existing address knowledge as opposed to random generation, with the latter appearing more cognitively effortful. As such, they often unwittingly provide clues to the real address being concealed, therefore, affording increased possibilities in identifying them as liars at point of contact and in tracing them after the fact

Topics: H1
Publisher: Wiley
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2009). (Ed.). Criminal Investigative Failures. Boca Raton: doi
  2. (1997). (Eds). Machiavellian Intelligence II: Extensions and Evaluations. Cambridge: doi
  3. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuro-imaging. doi
  4. (2007). Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception ACID: an integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception. doi
  5. (1995). Behavioural correlates of deception in a simulated police interview. doi
  6. (2007). Believed cues to deception: Judgements in selfgenerated trivial and serious situations. doi
  7. (1989). Can deception by salespersons and customers be detected through non-verbal behavioural cues? doi
  8. (1995). Cognitive Psychology: A Student’s Handbook (Third Edition). doi
  9. (2008). Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice (Second edition).West Sussex:
  10. (2005). Discerning lies from truths: Behavioural cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition. doi
  11. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? doi
  12. (2007). HO/RT1culture: Cultivating police use of Home Office Road Traffic 1 form to identify active serious offenders. doi
  13. (2006). Home Office Identity Fraud Steering Committee. Updated Estimate for the Cost of Identity Fraud to the UK
  14. (2002). Identity Fraud: A Study. Found at (Accessed on 17th
  15. (2007). Investigative Interviewing. In doi
  16. (1996). Lying in Everyday Life. doi
  17. (2001). Lying when the stakes are high: Deceptive behaviour of a murderer during his police interview.
  18. (2008). On being happy and gullible: Mood effects on scepticism and the detection of deception. doi
  19. (1973). On the psychology of prediction.
  20. (2004). Orientating to guilty knowledge. doi
  21. (2008). Social Cognition. doi
  22. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. doi
  23. (2004). Suspicious minds: Criminal’s ability to detect deception. doi
  24. (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. doi
  25. (2006). The cognition of deception: The role of executive processes in producing lies. doi
  26. (1988). The evolution of deception. doi
  27. (2007). Those who do big bad things also usually do little bad things: Identifying active serious offenders using offender self-selection. doi
  28. Truth, lies and videotape. An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. doi
  29. (1991). Who can catch a liar? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.