Location of Repository

Setting standards for preventative services to reduce child health inequalities in Greater Manchester

By Deborah Baker, Serena McCluskey and NHS The Association of Greater Manchester Primary Care Trusts


Recent policy documents such as Every Child Matters and the National Service Framework for\ud Children, Young People and Maternity Services have indicated a fundamental shift in ways of\ud thinking about child health, emphasising the crucial role of preventative action as well as\ud treatment for ensuring that children have the best possible chance to reach their full potential.\ud This is paramount in deprived areas, where child poverty translates itself into social\ud disadvantage that affects the life chances of children from birth onwards. Whilst the NHS\ud cannot tackle the fundamental drivers of child poverty, it can make a substantial contribution to\ud improving the health and life chances of children living in deprived areas through making sure\ud that parents have access to the services they need and have the information and support to\ud make the best choices about the health and development of their children.\ud The World Health Organisation (WHO) in its strategy on equity in health states that disparities\ud in health status between different groups in the population should be reduced by improving the\ud health of the disadvantaged. Hence, the National Service Framework for Children, Young\ud People and Maternity Services set down 11 standards that define, in general terms, the aims\ud and objectives of services for all children (standards 1-5), services for particular groups of\ud children and young people (standards 6-10) and maternity services (standard 11). These\ud standards underpin a more generic health inequalities target that sets the goal of a reduction of\ud at least 10% in the gap in infant mortality between manual groups and the population as a\ud whole in 2010

Topics: H1, HQ, RJ101
Publisher: University of Salford
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:9199

Suggested articles



  1. (1995). A full-scale RCT in this hard-to-reach group would require a range of flexible approaches rather than a fully defined intervention, and presents challenges for trial design. APPENDICES Method and outcome summary table for all studies _ •
  2. al Cluster • Low socioeconomic status 100 general practices were Biochemically confirmed smoking 61 62 (2003) Tappin et al (2005) RCT • Low socioeconomic status randomised into three trial arms: A
  3. (1994). al Evaluation • Low socioeconomic status Two surveys were conducted among Measuring awareness of the campaign
  4. (1996). al Intervention • Low socioeconomic status Initial discussions and workshops Identifying PND in Asian women
  5. (1994). al Pregnant An evaluation of a There was a significant increase among the sample Smoking cessation programs need to be more
  6. al Pregnant Cluster randomised There was a small significant increase in quitting at Given that the intervention was resource intensive, it (2003) smokers who trial of two the combined intervention arm compared with is of doubtful benefit.
  7. (2001). al Pregnant RCT of a one-off Pregnant women who continued to smoke were A brief one-off smoking cessation intervention by
  8. (2006). Department of Health. Healthy Start Application Leaflet (HS01) Free Milk, Fruit, Vegetables and Vitamins for You and Your Family.
  9. (2001). Low socioeconomic status Midwives were randomised to deliver Continuous abstinence for at least 3
  10. (2005). Low socioeconomic status Various Preventing PND in 'at risk' women Creedy
  11. (2007). Racial variation in the association between gestational age and perinatal mortality: prospective study. BMJ.
  12. (2003). Review • Ethnicity Various Initiation and duration of breastfeeding• Adolescent mothers • Access to services• Low socioeconomic status APPENDICES ~. -~ f'"' ~f~- .~ :' '".~ .- - - ..- ~' '77 ~
  13. (2007). The impact of a community-based food skills intervention on cooking confidence, food preparation methods and dietary choices - an exploratory trial. Public Health Nutrition.
  14. (2006). Validation of a food-frequency questionnaire for use in pregnancy. Public Health Nutrition.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.