Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

It Looks Good, but What is it Like to Live There? Exploring the Impact of Innovative Housing Design on Crime

By Rachel Armitage, Leanne Monchuk and Michelle Rogerson

Abstract

This paper reports on the findings of a collaborative project (funded by the Home Office and managed by the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment - CABE) which was conducted in late 2009 and early 2010. The project set out to strengthen and update the evidence base on the impact of design on a range of crime types – with a specific focus upon housing developments acclaimed for their innovative design and award winning architecture. This paper presents the findings of an in-depth assessment of the impact of housing design features on crime. Utilising a comprehensive data collection exercise, the specific design features of thousands of homes were collated and assessed against police recorded crime data. The design features were based upon the key elements of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) including road layout, house design, surveillance, territoriality, car parking, communal space, management and maintenance and physical security. The unique and painstaking methodology not only provided an excellent dataset for analysis, but also highlighted the need both for greater conceptual clarity within CPTED and for crime-risk assessments to be based on the careful operationalisation and measurement of CPTED factors. As well as assessing the impact of specific (and combined) design features upon crime, the research also resulted in the production of a new data collection tool designed to address the weaknesses of existing checklists in assessing innovative contemporary developments, which are often unconventional in nature. The paper explores the degree of conflict and/or synergy between the traditional principles of CPTED and contemporary directions in architecture and design. Finally the paper considers the extent to which traditional CPTED principles remain relevant within contemporary residential developments and explores whether areas of revision are required

Topics: HN, HV
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:9356

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1995). 21st Century Homes: Building to Last.
  2. (1988). A User’s Guide to MLwiN,
  3. (1968). ACPO Secured by Design (2010) New Homes 2010. London,
  4. (2000). An Evaluation of Secured by Design Housing within West Yorkshire – Briefing Note 7/00. London, Home Office.
  5. (1987). Armed Robbery: Cops, Robbers, and Victims. doi
  6. (1991). Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary. doi
  7. (1984). Burglar Mobility and Preventive Planning. doi
  8. (1998). Burglary in affluent communities: a planning perspective. In: M. Felson & Pieser (eds) Reducing Crime Through Real Estate Development and Management. Washington DC: Urban Land Institute.
  9. (2004). Can streets be made safer. doi
  10. (1977). Changing Street Layouts to Reduce Residential Burglary: Paper presented to the American Society of Criminology.
  11. Communities and Local Government (2008a) Eco-Towns: Living a Greener Future. London, Department for Communities and Local Government.
  12. Communities and Local Government (2008b) The Code For Sustainable Homes: Setting The Standard In Sustainability For New Homes. [Online]. Available from: http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/codesustainabilitystandard s.
  13. (1996). Creating Defensible Space. doi
  14. (2009). Crime and Urban Design: An Evidence-based Approach
  15. (1998). Crime and Urban Layout: The Need for Evidence: Home Office Crime Prevention College.
  16. (2000). Crime And Urban Layout: The Need For Evidence. In:
  17. (1973). Crime as Work. doi
  18. (1991). Crime Free Housing.
  19. (1997). Crime in the urban environment,
  20. (1996). Crime Prevention and Sustainability.
  21. (2002). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design doi
  22. (2007). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design – Guidelines for Queensland. Part A: Essential Features of Safer Places.
  23. (1998). Culs-de-sac hit the Skids. Building Design,
  24. (1995). Defensible Space: A New Physical Planning Tool for Urban Revitalization. doi
  25. (2008). Delivering Great Places to Live: 20 Questions You Need to Answer. Building for Life.
  26. (2003). Designing out Crime: Insights from Eco-Design. doi
  27. (1998). Designing Out Gang Homicides and Street Assaults doi
  28. (1987). Environmental Design, Crime and Prevention: An Examination of Community Dynamics. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of the doi
  29. (2006). Exploring The Influence of Environmental Features on Residential Burglary Using Spatial-Temporal Pattern Analysis.
  30. (2006). Exploring The Influence of Environmental Features on Residential Burglary Using Spatial-Temporal Pattern Analysis. Unpublished PhD dissertation,
  31. (2000). Housing Layout and Crime Vulnerability. doi
  32. (2005). It should be highlighted that one study (Nubani and Wineman,
  33. (1990). Neighbourhood Permeability and Burglary Rates. doi
  34. (2004). Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Office doi
  35. (2010). Permeability and Burglary Risk: Are Cul-de-Sacs Safer? doi
  36. (2007). Planning, Crime and Urban Sustainability. doi
  37. (2006). Predicting and Preventing: Developing a Risk Assessment Mechanism for Residential Housing. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: doi
  38. (2002). Preventing Crime at Places. In: doi
  39. (2009). Reconciling Security with Sustainability: The Challenge for Eco-Homes. doi
  40. (1992). Regulating Street Prostitution.
  41. (2004). Repeat Personal Victimisation, Random Effects, Event Dependence and Unexplained Heterogeneity, doi
  42. (1975). Residential Burglary and Urban Form. doi
  43. (1986). Robbers as Decision Makers. doi
  44. (2003). Spatial configuration and vulnerability of residential burglary: a Case study of a city in Taiwan,
  45. (2000). Suburban Burglary: A Tale of Two Suburbs – Second Edition.
  46. (2007). Sustainability Versus Safety: Confusion, Conflict and Contradiction in Designing out Crime. In:
  47. (2002). Sustainable Urban Development and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design for the British City. Towards an effective Urban Environmentalism for the 21st Century. doi
  48. (2001). Target Search of Burglars: A Revised Economic Model. Papers in Regional Science, doi
  49. (1983). Territoriality, Defensible Space and Residential Burglary: An Environmental Analysis. doi
  50. (1990). Testing Building Plans for Public Safety: Usefulness of the Delft Checklist. doi
  51. (1998). The
  52. (2000). The ‘Road to Nowhere’: The Evidence for Travelling Criminals, Home Office Research Study 207. London, Home Office. doi
  53. (1994). The Impact On Crime Of Street Closures And Barricades: A Florida Case Study.
  54. (1980). The Link Between Crime and the Built Environment. The Current State of Knowledge.
  55. (2005). The Role of Space Syntax in Identifying the Relationship Between Space and Crime.
  56. (1968). The Social Order of the Slum. doi
  57. (2009). This Way to Better Residential Streets.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.