Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Horwich on meaning and use

By J. Katzav

Abstract

Paul Horwich claims that theories of meaning ought to accommodate the commonsense intuition that meanings play a part in explaining the use of words. Further, he argues that the view that best does so is that according to which the meaning of a word is constituted by a disposition to accept, in some circumstances, sentences in which it features. I argue that if meanings are construed thus, they will in fact fail to explain the use of words. I also argue that if we insist, as Horwich does, on the commonsense assumption that meanings are a species of entity, all versions of the view that meaning is constituted by our dispositions to use words will have to be rejected. I do not, however, claim that such theories ought to be rejected. My point is that they are incompatible with the requirements of commonsense. Further, I suggest that it is premature to impose such requirements on theories of meaning

Publisher: Blackwell
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:3234

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.