Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Die »Notwendigkeit eines Vaters für das Kind« und der Zugang lesbischer Frauen zur Reproduktionsmedizin (The child’s need for a father and access to assisted reproductive technologies by lesbians)

By Eric Blyth


This chapter provides an overview of two broad areas relating to lesbians’ use of reproductive services for family building. First, it identifies strategies used in the building of ‘planned’ lesbian families – where a lesbian couple, the genetic mother and the social or ‘co’ mother, plan their family together - and in which children are raised from birth without the presence of a father. Second, it reviews policy and legislation regulating and restricting lesbians’ use of reproductive services in a number of countries both globally and specifically in Europe, before considering in more detail the ‘need for a father’ debate in the United Kingdom that resulted in legislative provisions effective from October 2009, formally ending discrimination against lesbians seeking to access fertility services in the United Kingdo

Topics: H1, HM
Publisher: Transcript Verlag
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1994). A history of infertility counselling in the United Kingdom.
  2. (2001). Access to services at assisted reproductive technology clinics: A survey of policies and practices. doi
  3. (2002). American Academy of Pediatrics doi
  4. (2009). and The European IVFmonitoring (EIM) Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) doi
  5. (2009). and The European IVFmonitoring (EIM) Consortium, for the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority doi
  6. (1994). Artificial insemination of single women and lesbian women with donor semen, doi
  7. (1993). Assisted reproduction and the welfare of the child, doi
  8. Baroness (2007a) ‘Peers attack ‘fatherless’ IVF bid’.
  9. (2002). Can fertility service providers justify discrimination against lesbians? Human Fertility. doi
  10. (1994). Challenging Conceptions: Planning a Family by Self-Insemination, doi
  11. (1983). Children in lesbian and single-parent households: Psychosexual and psychiatric appraisal. doi
  12. (2009). Children of lesbian and gay parents doi
  13. (2004). Conference of England and Wales and the Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics
  14. (2009). Cross-border reproductive care in Belgium. Human Reproduction, advanced access People Science & Policy doi
  15. (2000). Everybody’s got a Dad”: Issues for lesbian families in the management of donor insemination’ doi
  16. (1997). Families of Choice: Research Results. doi
  17. (1995). Families of the lesbian baby boom, doi
  18. (1991). Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays and Kinship, doi
  19. (2007). Fertility obstacles call for unique solutions.
  20. (2009). House of Lords/House of Commons doi
  21. (2009). Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority doi
  22. (2009). Islamic identity and the ethics of assisted reproduction.
  23. (2006). IVF ‘need for father’ rule may go.
  24. (2002). Lesbian and gay parenthood. In doi
  25. (2002). Lesbian issues strengths.
  26. (1999). Lesbian mother families. In doi
  27. (1995). Lesbian mothers who conceived after donor insemination: a follow up study.
  28. (1993). Lesbian Mothers: Accounts of Gender in American Culture, doi
  29. (1999). Lesbian parents: Understanding development pathways.
  30. (2009). Looking Straight at Gay Parents.
  31. (2000). Opting into motherhood lesbians blurring the boundaries and transforming the meaning of parenthood and kinship. doi
  32. (2006). Potential sperm donors’, recipients’ and their partners’ opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western Australia. Human Reproduction. doi
  33. (1982). Psychological health and factors the court seeks to control in lesbian mother custody trials. doi
  34. (2008). Redefining family.
  35. (2008). Redefining family. Minnesota Women’s Press.
  36. (2007). Regulation or Free Markets? An Uncomfortable Question for Sperm Banks. Science Progress. 7 November (Accessed 17
  37. (2005). Replies by the member states to the Questionnaire on access to medically assisted procreation (MAP) and on right to know about their origin for children born after MAP. Steering Committee of Bioethics. CDBI/INF (2005) 7. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  38. (2009). Research in progress: A report on policies of access to AID as a medical treatment in the UK, doi
  39. (2005). Screening practices and beliefs of assisted reproductive technology programs. doi
  40. (2006). Seeking sperm: accounts of lesbian couples’ reproductive decisionmaking and understandings of the needs of the child. doi
  41. (2004). Spreading Scandinavian Genes, without Viking Boats. Arhus Journal. 30 September. nted=1&ei=5070&en=f76468c2f01e2601&ex=1110862800&oref=login (Accessed 17
  42. (2007). The 7.30 report. doi
  43. (1994). The gap between psychosocial assumptions and empirical research in lesbian-mother child custody cases. In A. Gottfried (ed) Redefining families: Implications for children's development. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.