Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Highly contrasting effects of different climate forcing agents on terrestrial ecosystem services

By C. Huntingford, P.M. Cox, L.M. Mercado, S. Sitch, N. Bellouin, O. Boucher and N. Gedney

Abstract

Many atmospheric constituents besides carbon dioxide (CO2) contribute to global warming, and it is common to compare their influence on climate in terms of radiative forcing, which measures their impact on the planetary energy budget. A number of recent studies have shown that many radiatively active constituents also have important impacts on the physiological functioning of ecosystems, and thus the ‘ecosystem services’ that humankind relies upon. CO2 increases have most probably increased river runoff and had generally positive impacts on plant growth where nutrients are non-limiting, whereas increases in near-surface ozone (O3) are very detrimental to plant productivity. Atmospheric aerosols increase the fraction of surface diffuse light, which is beneficial for plant growth. To illustrate these differences, we present the impact on net primary productivity and runoff of higher CO2, higher near-surface O3, and lower sulphate aerosols, and for equivalent changes in radiative forcing. We compare this with the impact of climate change alone, arising, for example, from a physiologically inactive gas such as methane (CH4). For equivalent levels of change in radiative forcing, we show that the combined climate and physiological impacts of these individual agents vary markedly and in some cases actually differ in sign. This study highlights the need to develop more informative metrics of the impact of changing atmospheric constituents that go beyond simple radiative forcing

Topics: Meteorology and Climatology, Economics, Hydrology, Earth Sciences, Atmospheric Sciences, Health
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0314
OAI identifier: oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:14124

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). An analogue model to derive additional climate change scenarios from existing GCM simulations.
  2. (2003). Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. doi
  3. (2005). Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. doi
  4. (2005). Carbon flux and growth in mature deciduous forest trees exposed to elevated CO2.
  5. Changes in climate and land use have a larger direct impact than rising CO2 on global river runoff trends.
  6. (2006). Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records.
  7. (2003). Effect of climate change on isoprene emissions and surface ozone levels.
  8. (2005). Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.
  9. (2009). Global dimming and brightening: a review. doi
  10. (2006). Global health benefits of mitigation ozone pollution with methane controls.
  11. (2001). Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. doi
  12. (2007). Improving the representation of radiation interception and photosynthesis for climate model applications.
  13. (2007). Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink. doi
  14. (2007). Influence of carbon–nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability. Global Biogeochem. doi
  15. (2010). Methane radiative forcing controls the permissible CO2 emissions for climate stabilization. doi
  16. (2001). Millions at risk: defining critical climate change threats and targets.
  17. (1986). Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. doi
  18. (2008). Observed climate change constrains the likelihood of extreme future global warming. doi
  19. (2009). Ocean acidification’s potential to alter global marine ecosystem services. doi
  20. (2001). Radiative forcing of climate change.
  21. (2006). Radiative forcing since preindustrial times due to ozone changes in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere.
  22. (2000). Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability, Part II: Development of 1901–96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate.
  23. (2001). Should phosphorus availability be constraining moist tropical forest responses to increasing CO2 concentrations? In Global biogeochemical cycles in the climate system (eds
  24. (1995). Stomatal responses to increased CO2—implications from the plant to the global scale.
  25. (2005). Strong present-day aerosol cooling implies a hot future. doi
  26. (2007). To what extent do current and projected increases in surface ozone affect photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of trees? A metaanalytic review of the last three decades of experiments. doi
  27. (2007). Understanding and attributing climate change. In Climate change 2007: the physical basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.