Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Firearm suicide decedents in the Republic of Ireland, 1980–2005

By K. Sarma and Susanna Kola

Abstract

Objectives\ud To compare the sociodemographic characteristics of firearms suicide decedents and other suicide decedents in the Republic of Ireland between 1980 and 2005.\ud \ud Study design\ud A cross-sectional study of sociodemographic characteristics of those who committed suicide with a firearm and those who committed suicide by an alternative method.\ud \ud Methods\ud Suicide data from 1980 to 2005 inclusive, provided by the Central Statistics Office of Ireland, were analysed. For the purpose of this paper, suicide method was collapsed into two groups: firearm-assisted suicide (FAS) and non-firearm-assisted suicide (n-FAS). Differences in gender, marital status (married vs not married), area of residence (urban vs rural), agri-employment (agri-employed vs not agri-employed) and age were examined between the two groups. A logistic regression is presented using suicide method (FAS vs n-FAS) as the criterion variable and individual factors as predictors.\ud \ud Results\ud In total, 9674 suicides were recorded from 1 January 1980 to 31 December 2005. Seven hundred and ninety-three of these were FAS and 8881 were n-FAS. For both suicide profiles, the deceased were predominantly male, living in a rural setting and not married. However, this profile was more salient in the FAS group. In comparison with the n-FAS group, a greater proportion of the FAS decedents were male [χ2(1)=152.5, P≤0.0001, odds ratio (OR)=4.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.4–6.1], from a rural setting [χ2(1)=153.5, P≤0.0001, OR=4.4, 95%CI 3.2–5.6) and agri-employed [χ2(1)=21.3, P≤0.0001, OR=1.5, 95%CI 1.3–1.8). FAS decedents were significantly younger than n-FAS victims, although the size of this effect was small (z=−8.4, P<0.0005, r=−0.1). There was no difference in marital status between the two groups.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud Risk factors for FAS should inform policy-making in this area, with particular attention paid to protecting young males resident in rural settings. Consideration should be given to targeting agri-employed individuals as a specific at-risk group

Topics: HV
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:9688

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). Access to methods of suicide: what impact? doi
  2. and method of suicide. doi
  3. Changing times: a longitudinal analysis of international firearm suicide data. doi
  4. (1998). Cook PJ,Smith TW. The gender gap in reporting household gun ownership. doi
  5. firearm, and non-domestic gas suicides among males: a comparative study. doi
  6. (2010). Firearms assisted suicide: Legislative, policing and clinical concerns. doi
  7. Firearms availability and suicide: Evidence, interventions, and future directions. doi
  8. (2005). Gunshot suicides in England--a multicentre study based on coroners' records. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol doi
  9. hanging and drowning suicides in the Republic of Ireland. doi
  10. (1970). Increasing rural-urban gradients in US suicide mortality, doi
  11. Isometsa E,Lonnqvist J. Do means matter? Differences in characteristics of Finnish suicide completers using different methods. doi
  12. Lethality of suicide methods. doi
  13. Marcus SC,Kaplan MS. Racial differences in the characteristics of firearm suicide decedents in the United States. doi
  14. Marital status and suicide in the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. doi
  15. Relationship of suicide rates to social factors and availability of lethal methods. doi
  16. (2008). Responding to firearms assisted suicide in Ireland: A review of core concerns and lessons from abroad. doi
  17. (2003). Risk factors for male and female suicide decedents ages 15-64 in the United States. Results from the 1993 National Mortality Followback Survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol doi
  18. Sex and suicide. Gender differences in suicidal behaviour. doi
  19. (1989). Sociodemographic and geographic patterns of firearm suicide in the United States, doi
  20. Socioeconomic change and suicide: a time-series study from the Republic of Ireland. doi
  21. Suicide acts in 8 states: incidence and case fatality rates by demographics and method. doi
  22. Suicide and changing values and beliefs in Ireland. doi
  23. Suicide by gunshot in the United Kingdom: a review of the literature. doi
  24. (2001). Suicide in Ireland - A national study. Dublin: The Department of Public Health
  25. (1994). Suicide in rural communities. doi
  26. Suicide in the farming community: methods used and contact with health services. doi
  27. Suicide methods in Europe: a gender-specific analysis of countries participating in the &quot;European Alliance Against Depression&quot;. doi
  28. Suicide mortality in the European Union.
  29. (1981). The association between changes in household firearm ownership and rates of suicide in the United States, doi
  30. The epidemiology of firearm suicide in the United States.
  31. The US gun stock: results from the 2004 national firearms survey. doi
  32. (2004). Urban-rural shifts in intentional firearm death: Different causes, same results. doi
  33. (1981). Urban/rural inequalities in suicide in doi
  34. (1987). Urbanism and suicide: A study of American Counties. Soc Forces doi
  35. (2006). Use of army weapons and private firearms for suicide and homicide in the region of Basel, doi
  36. Use of army weapons and private firearms for suicide and homicide in the region of Basel, Switzerland. doi
  37. violent crime, and suicide in 21 countries.
  38. (1999). Young guns: an empirical study of persons who use a firearm in a suicide or a homicide. Inj Prev doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.