Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Freeze or flee? : negative stimuli elicit selective responding

By Zachary Estes and Michelle Verges

Abstract

Humans preferentially attend to negative stimuli. A consequence of this automatic vigilance for negative valence is that negative words elicit slower responses than neutral or positive words on a host of cognitive tasks. Some researchers have speculated that negative stimuli elicit a general suppression of motor activity, akin to the freezing response exhibited by animals under threat. Alternatively, we suggest that negative stimuli only elicit slowed responding on tasks for which stimulus valence is irrelevant for responding. To discriminate between these motor suppression and response-relevance hypotheses, we elicited both lexical decisions and valence judgments of negative words and positive words. Relative to positive words (e.g., kitten), negative words (e.g., spider) elicited slower lexical decisions but faster valence judgments. Results therefore indicate that negative stimuli do not cause a generalized motor suppression. Rather, negative stimuli elicit selective responding, with faster responses on tasks for which stimulus valence is response-relevant

Topics: BF
Publisher: Elsevier
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:76

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). (in press). Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: doi
  2. (2005). A pictorial version of the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task: Sensitivity to generally affective and phobia-relevant stimuli in high and low spider fearful individuals. doi
  3. (2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. doi
  4. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings.
  5. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilizationminimization hypothesis. doi
  6. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. doi
  7. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. doi
  8. (2005). Communicating about danger: Urgency alarm calling in a bird. doi
  9. (2006). Determinants of vigilance behavior in the ring-tailed coati (Nasua nasua): The importance of within-group spatial position. doi
  10. (1997). Diana monkey long distance calls: Messages for conspecifics and predators. doi
  11. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. doi
  12. (2003). Hawk calls elicit alarm and defensive reactions in captive Geoffroy’s marmosets (Callithrix geoffroyi). doi
  13. (2003). I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. doi
  14. (1995). Intrusive cognitions: An investigation of the emotional Stroop task. doi
  15. (2003). Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation.
  16. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. doi
  17. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. doi
  18. (2000). Orienting to exogenous cues and attentional bias to affective pictures reflect separate processes. doi
  19. (1997). Phobia related cognitive bias for pictorial and linguistic stimuli. doi
  20. (1990). Predator avoidance behaviour in the buffyheaded marmoset, Callithrix flaviceps. doi
  21. (2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. doi
  22. (2003). Signalers and receivers in animal communication. doi
  23. (2001). Snake fear and the pictorial emotional Stroop paradigm.
  24. (2002). Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency. doi
  25. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. doi
  26. (1982). Thoughts on the relationship between emotion and cognition. doi
  27. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.