Location of Repository

Delusional beliefs and reason giving

By Lisa Bortolotti and Matthew R. Broome

Abstract

Delusions are often regarded as irrational beliefs, but their irrationality is not sufficient to explain what is pathological about them. In this paper we ask whether deluded subjects have the capacity to support the content of their delusions with reasons, that is, whether they can author their delusional states. The hypothesis that delusions are characterised by a failure of authorship, which is a dimension of self knowledge, deserves to be\ud empirically tested because (a) it has the potential to account for the distinction between endorsing a delusion and endorsing a framework belief; (b) it contributes to a\ud philosophical analysis of the relationship between rationality and self knowledge; and (c) it informs diagnosis and therapy in clinical psychiatry. However, authorship cannot provide a demarcation criterion between delusions and other irrational belief states

Topics: BF
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:116

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2006). A neuropsychiatric model of biological and psychological processes in the remission of delusions and auditory hallucinations. doi
  2. (2004). Agency, Simulation and Self-identification. doi
  3. (2003). An elusive challenge to the authorship account. doi
  4. (1990). Anomalies: Preference Reversals. doi
  5. (2001). Authority and Estrangement: an Essay on Self knowledge. doi
  6. (2001). Authorship and ownership of thoughts. doi
  7. (2004). Authorship Processing. doi
  8. (2004). Bottom up or top down? doi
  9. (2005). Clinical Manifestations of Psychiatric Disorders.
  10. (2007). Delusion formation and reasoning biases in those at clinical high risk for psychosis. doi
  11. (2005). Delusional belief. doi
  12. (1997). Delusions and brain injury: the philosophy and psychology of belief. doi
  13. (2005). Delusions and the background of rationality. doi
  14. (1991). Delusions as ‘wrong beliefs’: a conceptual history.
  15. (1999). Dopamine as the wind of the psychotic fire: new evidence from brain imaging studies. doi
  16. (2007). DSM and the Death of Phenomenology in America: An Example of Unintended Consequences. doi
  17. (1994). Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude change: the moderating role of attitude accessibility. doi
  18. (2003). Elusive reasons: a problem for first-person authority. doi
  19. (2002). Ending the Rationality Wars: How to Make Disputes About Human Rationality Disappear. In doi
  20. (2005). Evidence for onset of antipsychotic effects within the first 24 hours of treatment. doi
  21. (2003). First persons: On Richard Moran’s Authority and Estrangement. doi
  22. (2005). From dopamine to salience to psychosis--linking biology, pharmacology and phenomenology of psychosis. doi
  23. (2004). How antipsychotics become anti-’psychotic’--from dopamine to salience to psychosis. doi
  24. (2007). If you didn’t care, you wouldn’t notice: recognition and estrangement in psychopathology.
  25. (2000). Imagination, delusion and hallucinations. doi
  26. (2007). Implications for Neurobiological Research of Cognitive Models of Psychosis. doi
  27. (2005). In defence of the doxastic conception of delusion. doi
  28. (2002). Marks of irrationality. doi
  29. (1994). Mind and mine.
  30. (2002). Monothematic Delusions: Towards a Two- Factor Account. doi
  31. (2004). Neurocognitive models of schizophrenia: A neurophenomenological critique. doi
  32. (2001). Normativity and Rationality in Delusional Psychiatric Disorders Draft: Please do not quote without the authors’ permission.
  33. (1969). On Certainty. doi
  34. (2000). On understanding schizophrenia. doi
  35. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. doi
  36. (2004). Précis of Authority and Estrangement. doi
  37. (2003). Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. doi
  38. (2003). Psychosis prediction: 12-month follow up of a high-risk (‘prodromal’) group. doi
  39. (2004). Rationality in psychosis and understanding the deluded. doi
  40. (2001). Rationality, Meaning and the Analysis of Delusion. doi
  41. (2003). Re-examining thought insertion. doi
  42. (2004). Reconceiving Delusions. doi
  43. Sadock (eds.) doi
  44. (1999). Schizophrenia, the space of reasons and thinking as a motor process. doi
  45. (2003). Symptoms in the Mind. Saunders: Elsevier Publishing. Draft: Please do not quote without the authors’ permission.
  46. (2006). The delusional stance. doi
  47. (2002). The Ownership of Thoughts. doi
  48. (1994). The Paradoxes of Delusion. Cornell: doi
  49. (2005). The self as narrator. doi
  50. (2004). Understanding Wittgenstein’s ‘On Certainty’. doi
  51. (2005). What causes the onset of psychosis? doi
  52. (1998). What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? doi
  53. (2000). When Self Consciousness Breaks: Alien Voices and Inserted Thoughts. doi
  54. (1999). Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahwah: Erlbaum Associates. doi
  55. (1996). Without Good Reasons. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.