Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Managing Injuries of the Neck Trial (MINT) : design of a randomised\ud controlled trial of treatments for whiplash associated disorders

By S. E. (Sallie E.) Lamb, Simon Gates, Martin Underwood, Matthew (Professor of clinical systems design) Cooke, Deborah Ashby, Ala Szczepura, Mark A. Williams, Esther M. Williamson, Emma J. Withers, Shahrul Mt Isa and Anil Gumber


Background: A substantial proportion of patients with whiplash injuries develop chronic\ud symptoms. However, the best treatment of acute injuries to prevent long-term problems is\ud uncertain. A stepped care treatment pathway has been proposed, in which patients are given advice\ud and education at their initial visit to the emergency department (ED), followed by review at three\ud weeks and physiotherapy for those with persisting symptoms. MINT is a two-stage randomised\ud controlled trial to evaluate two components of such a pathway: 1. use of The Whiplash Book versus\ud usual advice when patients first attend the emergency department; 2. referral to physiotherapy\ud versus reinforcement of advice for patients with continuing symptoms at three weeks.\ud Methods: Evaluation of the Whiplash Book versus usual advice uses a cluster randomised design\ud in emergency departments of eight NHS Trusts. Eligible patients are identified by clinicians in\ud participating emergency departments and are sent a study questionnaire within a week of their ED\ud attendance. Three thousand participants will be included. Patients with persisting symptoms three\ud weeks after their ED attendance are eligible to join an individually randomised study of\ud physiotherapy versus reinforcement of the advice given in ED. Six hundred participants will be\ud randomised. Follow-up is at 4, 8 and 12 months after their ED attendance. Primary outcome is the\ud Neck Disability Index (NDI), and secondary outcomes include quality of life and time to return to\ud work and normal activities. An economic evaluation is being carried out.\ud Conclusion: This paper describes the protocol and operational aspects of a complex intervention\ud trial based in NHS emergency and physiotherapy departments, evaluating two components of a\ud stepped-care approach to the treatment of whiplash injuries. The trial uses two randomisations,\ud with the first stage being cluster randomised and the second individually randomised

Topics: R1
Publisher: Biomed central
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). A randomized clinical trial comparing general exercise, McKenzie treatment and a control group in patients with neck pain. doi
  2. (2004). Bierma-Zeinstra SMA: Conservative treatments for whiplash. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews doi
  3. (1994). Bogduk N: Whiplash injury: clinical review. Pain doi
  4. Bouter LM: Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain. A randomized, controlled trial. doi
  5. (2001). C: A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature. Spine doi
  6. (2002). CH: Two-year Followup of a randomized clinical trial of spinal manipulation and two types of exercise for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine doi
  7. (1983). Clinical trials: A Practical Approach doi
  8. (2000). Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research doi
  9. (2000). Early intervention in whiplash-associated disorders: a comparison of two treatment protocols. Spine doi
  10. (2003). Evidence for exercise therapy in mechanical neck disorders. Man Ther doi
  11. G: Sub-group analyses in randomised controlled trial: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. doi
  12. (2005). GS: Informed patient consent to participation in cluster randomized trials: an empirical exploration of trials in primary care. Clinical Trials doi
  13. (1998). MC: Uncertainty in decision models analysing cost-effectiveness: the joint distribution of incremental costs and effectiveness evaluated with a nonparametric bootstrap method. Medical Decision Making doi
  14. (1996). Outcome of 'whiplash' neck injury. Injury doi
  15. Peripheral Manipulation 5th edition. Butterworth-Heinemann .
  16. (1999). Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences. BMJ doi
  17. (2000). Statistical Concepts London: Royal College of General Practitioners;
  18. (1998). The cost of whiplash-associated disorders. In Whiplash Injuries: current concepts in prevention diagnosis, and treatment of the cervical whiplash syndrome Edited by: Gunzburg
  19. (1996). The nosologic status of the whiplash syndrome: a critical review based on a methodological approach. Spine doi
  20. The Whiplash Book. London: The Stationery Office Ltd;
  21. (2002). Whiplash associated disorders: a review of the literature to guide patient information and advice. Emerg Med J doi
  22. (1995). Zeiss E: Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.