Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Primary group size, social support, gender and future\ud mental health status in a prospective study of people\ud living in private households throughout Great Britain

By T. S. (Traolach S.) Brugha, Scott Weich, Nicola Singleton, Glyn Lewis, Paul Bebbington, Rachel Jenkins and Howard Meltzer

Abstract

Background. Structural characteristics of social networks such as primary group size have received\ud less attention than measures of perceived social support. Previous research suggests that associations\ud between social network size and later common mental disorder status may differ according to\ud sex and initial mental state.\ud Method. Adults participating in the 2000 British National Household Survey of psychiatric\ud morbidity were randomly selected for follow-up 18 months later. The revised Clinical Interview\ud Schedule (CIS-R) and the Interview Measure of Social Relations (IMSR) were administered at\ud baseline and follow-up. Primary group size was defined as the total number of close relatives and\ud friends. A four-level scale of common mental disorder was modelled with ordinal logistic regression,\ud based on weighted data (n=2413).\ud Findings. After adjusting for confounders, a primary group size of three or less at time 1 predicted\ud worse mental health at time 2. This effect was greatest in men who were initially non-cases at\ud baseline (averaged odds 4.5) and in women who were initially cases at baseline (average odds 2.9).\ud Primary group size at time 2 was significantly predicted by level of common mental disorder at time\ud 1 in women but not in men. Thus, confounding by baseline disorder does not explain risk of\ud developing poor mental health in socially isolated men.\ud Conclusion. This study replicates the strong effects of primary group size on future mental health\ud that emerge when men and women are studied separately and when subjects are categorized\ud according to baseline mental health status

Topics: BF
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:247

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1987). The buffer theory of social support – a review of the literature. doi
  2. (1999). Recall of depressive episode 25 years previously. doi
  3. (2000). Measuring social integration and social networks. doi
  4. (1999). A difference that matters: comparisons of structured and semi-structured diagnostic interviews of adults in the general population. doi
  5. (1990). Gender, social support and recovery from depressive disorders: a prospective clinical study. doi
  6. (1992). Social support: heredity, environment and conditional associations. doi
  7. (1982). Social networks, attachments and support in minor affective disorders: a replication. doi
  8. (2003). Social support networks and type of neurotic symptom among adults in British households. doi
  9. (1998). The Leicester 500 Project. Social support and the development of postnatal depressive symptoms, a prospective cohort survey. doi
  10. (1987). The Interview Measure of Social Relationships: the description and evaluation of a survey instrument for assessing personal social resources. doi
  11. (1993). The relationship of social network deficits with deficits in social functioning in long-term psychiatric disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
  12. (1995). A developmental perspective on social support networks. doi
  13. (1987). The Health and Lifestyle Survey. Health Promotion Research Trust.
  14. (1978). The patient’s primary group.
  15. (2000). Men, women and friends – are there differences in relation to mental well-being? doi
  16. (2001). Social ties and mental health. doi
  17. (2000). Social support theory and measurement.
  18. (1992). Measuring psychiatric disorder in the community: a standardized assessment for use by lay interviewers. doi
  19. (1969). The concept and use of social networks.
  20. (2004). National Statistics Online (www.statistics.gov.uk). Office for National Statistics.
  21. (1973). Social adjustment and depression. A longitudinal study. doi
  22. (2001). National Statistics. Psychiatric Morbidity Among Adults Living in Private Households. The Stationery Office,
  23. (2003). Primary group size and future mental health status 713Singleton,
  24. (2002). Ordered/ordinal logistic regression with SAS and Stata (http://www.staff.washington.edu/ glynn/olr.pdf). Document prepared by the authors.
  25. (1999). STATA statistical software: release 6.0. Stata Corporation: College Station,
  26. (1986). Gender Differences in predicting loneliness from social network characteristics. doi
  27. (2002). Life events, number of social relationships, and twelve-month naturalistic course of major depression in a community sample of women. doi
  28. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.