Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Mortality and immortality : the Nobel Prize as an experiment into the effect of status upon longevity

By Matthew D. Rablen and Andrew J. Oswald


It has been known for centuries that the rich and famous have longer lives than the poor and ordinary. Causality, however, remains trenchantly debated. The ideal experiment\ud would be one in which extra status could somehow be dropped upon a sub-sample of individuals while those in a control group of comparable individuals received none. This\ud paper attempts to formulate a test in that spirit. It collects 19th-century birth data on science Nobel Prize winners. Correcting for potential biases, we estimate that winning the Prize, compared to merely being nominated, is associated with between 1 and 2 years of extra longevity

Topics: HV
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). wealthy, and wise? Tests for direct causal paths between health and socioeconomic status. doi
  2. (2003). Socio-economic status and health: Causality and pathways. doi
  3. (1993). Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient. American Psychologist doi
  4. (1999). Socioeconomic status and health: What we know and what we don't. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences doi
  5. (2001). Status in markets. doi
  6. (2008). Does wage rank affect workers’ well-being? Industrial Relations doi
  7. (1998). Comparison-concave utility and following behaviour in social and economic Settings. doi
  8. (1972). Regression models and life tables. doi
  9. (2002). The Nobel population 1901-1950: A census of the nominators and nominees for the prizes in physics and chemistry. Universal Academy Press: doi
  10. (2006). The determinants of mortality. doi
  11. (2001). Death in Hollywood: Any relation between self worth and mortality is uncertain.
  12. (2003). inequality, and economic development. doi
  13. (1992). Job strain and mortality in elderly men: Social network, support, and influence as buffers. doi
  14. (2002). Change in health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. doi
  15. (1985). The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. American Economic Review
  16. (2005). Knight fever: Towards an economics of awards. CESifo working paper 1468;
  17. (2005). Socio-economic status, health shocks, life satisfaction and mortality: Evidence from an increasing mixed proportional hazards model. Discussion paper 496, Centre for economic policy research,
  18. The causal effect of income on health: Evidence from German reunification. doi
  19. (2004). How is mortality affected by money, marriage, and stress? doi
  20. (2005). Why most published findings are false. PLoS Medicine doi
  21. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books: doi
  22. (2004). Work stress, socioeconomic status and neuroendocrine activation over the working day, Social Science and Medicine doi
  23. (1980). Human satisfactions and public policy. doi
  24. (2005). The relationship between education and adult mortality in the United States. Review of Economic Studies doi
  25. (1975). The impact of poor health on earnings. Review of Economics and Statistics doi
  26. (1978). Employment grade and coronary heart disease in British civil servants. doi
  27. (1984). Inequalities in death -- Specific explanations of a general pattern? Lancet doi
  28. (1991). Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet doi
  29. (1995). When less is more - Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medallists. doi
  30. (2003). Exploring the health-wealth nexus. doi
  31. (2006). Relative income, race, and mortality. doi
  32. (2007). unhappiness, and the challenge of affluence: Theory and evidence.
  33. (2000). Causality: models, reasoning and inference. doi
  34. Biographisch-literarisches handwörterbuch der exakten naturwissenschaften. doi
  35. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster: doi
  36. (2008). rank and the utility of income. doi
  37. (2007). Award-winning actors and actresses. doi
  38. Longevity of screenwriters who win an Academy Award: Longitudinal study. doi
  39. (1974). Cardio-respiratory disease and diabetes among middle-aged male civil servants: A study of screening and intervention. Lancet doi
  40. (1993). Endocrinology alfresco: Psychoendocrine studies of wild baboons. doi
  41. (2000). Social status, stress and health in female monkeys. In: Tarlov AR, St Peter RF (Eds.), The society and population health reader - A state and community perspective.
  42. (1998). Socioeconomic status and health.
  43. (1999). Healthy bodies and thick wallets: The dual relation between health and economic status. doi
  44. (2005). Unraveling the SES-health connection. Population and Development Review
  45. (2006). The effect of income on mortality: Evidence from the social security notch. Review of Economics and Statistics doi
  46. (1999). Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: Prospective results from the Whitehall II study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine doi
  47. (2005). Sifting the evidence—What's wrong with significance tests. doi
  48. (2006). Do oscar winners live longer than less successful peers? A re-analysis of the evidence. doi
  49. (2005). Creative careers: The life cycles of Nobel laureates in economics. doi
  50. (2000). Mind the gap: Hierarchies, health and human evolution. Weidenfeld and Nicolson: London;

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.