Location of Repository

Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming : comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006)

By Zachary Estes and James S. Adelman

Abstract

An automatic vigilance hypothesis states that humans preferentially attend to negative stimuli, and this attention to negative valence disrupts the processing of other stimulus properties. Thus, negative words typically elicit slower color naming, word naming, and lexical decisions than neutral or positive words. Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (see record 2006-04603-006) analyzed the stimuli from 32 published studies, and they found that word valence was confounded with several lexical factors known to affect word recognition. Indeed, with these lexical factors covaried out, Larsen et al. found no evidence of automatic vigilance. The authors report a more sensitive analysis of 1011 words. Results revealed a small but reliable valence effect, such that negative words (e.g., "shark") elicit slower lexical decisions and naming than positive words (e.g., "beach"). Moreover, the relation between valence and recognition was categorical rather than linear; the extremity of a word's valence did not affect its recognition. This valence effect was not attributable to word length, frequency, orthographic neighborhood size, contextual diversity, first phoneme, or arousal. Thus, the present analysis provides the most powerful demonstration of automatic vigilance to date

Topics: BF
Publisher: American Psychological Association
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:372

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2006). (this issue). Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: doi
  2. (2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. doi
  3. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. doi
  4. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings.
  5. (2003). Affective priming: Findings and theories. doi
  6. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. doi
  7. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. doi
  8. (2001). Categorical perception of facial expressions of emotion: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. doi
  9. (1992). Categorical perception of facial expressions. doi
  10. (2005). Categorical perception of vocal emotion expressions. doi
  11. (2003). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code? doi
  12. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? doi
  13. (1997). Facial expression megamix: Tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition. doi
  14. (1999). Fearfulness and affective evaluations of pictures.
  15. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. doi
  16. (1998). From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model. doi
  17. (2006). Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments. doi
  18. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. doi
  19. (2006). More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search. doi
  20. (2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. doi
  21. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A Web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and non-words. Available at http://elexicon.wustl.edu.
  22. (1982). Thoughts on the relationship between emotion and cognition. doi
  23. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.