Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Head up, foot down : object words orient attention to the objects' typical location

By Zachary Estes, Michelle Verges and Lawrence W. Barsalou


Many objects typically occur in particular locations, and object words encode these spatial associations. We tested whether such object words (e.g., head, foot) orient attention toward the location where the denoted object typically occurs (i.e., up, down). Because object words elicit perceptual simulations of the denoted objects (i.e., the representations acquired during actual perception are reactivated), we predicted that an object word would interfere with identification of an unrelated visual target subsequently presented in the object's typical location. Consistent with this prediction, three experiments demonstrated that words denoting objects that typically occur high in the visual field hindered identification of targets appearing at the top of the display, whereas words denoting low objects hindered target identification at the bottom of the display. Thus, object words oriented attention to and activated perceptual simulations in the objects' typical locations. These results shed new light on how language affects perception. \u

Topics: BF
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. doi
  2. (2003). Attention, researchers! It is time to take a look at the real world. doi
  3. (2001). Brain reflections of words and their meaning. doi
  4. (2005). Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. doi
  5. (1984). Components of visual orienting.
  6. (2000). Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. doi
  7. (1996). Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures. doi
  8. (2008). Grounded cognition. doi
  9. (1992). How visual imagery interferes with vision. doi
  10. (2001). Imagery-induced interference on a visual detection task. doi
  11. (2000). Inhibition of return. doi
  12. (2004). Moving words: Dynamic representations in language comprehension. doi
  13. (2005). Perception of motion affects language processing. doi
  14. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. doi
  15. (2000). Representation, space, and Hollywood Squares: Looking at things that aren’t there anymore. doi
  16. (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. doi
  17. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. doi
  18. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. doi
  19. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. doi
  20. (2007). The influence of vertical spatial orientation on property verification. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.