Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The distribution of range sizes of native and alien plants in four European countries and the effects of residence time

By Mark Williamson, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, Ingolf Kühn, Mark Hill, Stefan Klotz, Ann Milbau, Jane Stout and Petr Pyšek

Abstract

Aim Do the statistical distributions of range sizes of native and alien species differ? If so, is this because of residence time effects? And can such effects indicate an average time to a maximum?\ud \ud Location Ireland, Britain, Germany and the Czech Republic.\ud \ud Methods The data are presence or absence of higher plants in mapping units of 100 km2 (Ireland and Britain) or c. 130 km2 (Germany and the Czech Republic) in areas varying from 79 to 357 thousand km2. Logit transforms of range sizes so defined were tested for normality, and examined by ANOVA, and by loess, ordinary least square (OLS) and reduced major axis regressions.\ud \ud Results Current range sizes, in logits, are near normally distributed.\ud Those of native plants are larger than those of naturalized neophytes (plants introduced since 1500 ad) and much larger than those of casual neophytes. Archaeophytes (introduced earlier) have range sizes slightly larger than natives, except in Ireland. Residence time, the time since an invasive species arrived in the wild at a certain place, affects range sizes. The relationships of the range of naturalized neophytes to residence time are effectively straight in all four places, showing no significant curvature or asymptote back to 1500, though there are few records between 1500 and 1800. The relationships have an r2 of only about 10%. Both OLS regressions and reduced major axes can be used to estimate the time it takes for the range of a naturalized neophyte to reach a maximum.\ud \ud Main conclusions Established neophytes have smaller range size distributions than natives probably because many have not yet reached their maximum. We estimate it takes at least 150 years, possibly twice that, on average, for the maximum to be reached in areas of the order of\ud 105 km2. Policy needs to allow for the variation in rates of spread and particularly the long time needed to fill ranges. Most naturalized neophytes are still expanding their ranges in Europe

Topics: SB
Publisher: Blackwell
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:378

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). (in press) A provisional list of Irish archaeophytes.
  2. (1999). A simple transformation for sets of range sizes. doi
  3. (2004). Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. doi
  4. (2005). Alien plants in temperate weed communities: prehistoric and recent invaders occupy different habitats. doi
  5. (2002). Alien plants in the British Isles. Biological invasions: economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal, and microbe species doi
  6. (1994). Alien plants of the British Isles. doi
  7. (2004). Archaeophytes in Britain. doi
  8. (2005). Audit of non-native species in England, English Nature,
  9. (1995). Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3 edn. doi
  10. (2002). Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. doi
  11. (1999). Chorologisch-ökologische Auswertungen der Daten der floristischen Kartierung Deutschlands.
  12. (2006). Core Team
  13. (2007). Database of alien plants in Ireland. Irish Biochange project, Dublin. http://www.biochange.ie/alienplants NIST/SEMATECH
  14. (2006). Ecological patterns and biological invasions: using regional species inventories in macroecology. doi
  15. (2006). Grid square nomenclature.
  16. (2002). Klíč ke květeně České republiky.
  17. (2005). Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. doi
  18. (2008). Managing the global risks of invasive species. Submission by Diversitas/Global Invasive Species Program to the C[onvention on] B[iological] D[iversity] in depth review of invasive alien species. www.cbd.int Essl,
  19. (1999). Mapping the flora of
  20. (1998). Measuring the impact of plant invaders in Britain. Plant invasions: ecological mechanisms and human responses
  21. (2005). Minimum residence time, biogeographical origin, and life cycle as determinants of the geographical extent of naturalized plants in continental Chile. doi
  22. (2003). Naturalized Fabaceae (Leguminosae) species in Taiwan: the first approximation.
  23. (1986). Phytocartographical synthesis of the Czech Republic.
  24. (2003). Plant distribution patterns in Germany - Will aliens match natives? Feddes Repertorium doi
  25. (2006). Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. doi
  26. (2006). Predicting the invasion success of Mediterranean alien plants from their introduction characteristics. doi
  27. (2005). Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants. Invasive plants: ecological and agricultural aspects doi
  28. (2003). The alien flora of Germany – basics from a new German database. Plant Invasions: ecological threats and management solutions
  29. (2003). The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. doi
  30. (2007). Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? Biological invasions doi
  31. (1987). What makes a community invasible?
  32. (2004). Why do alien plant species that reproduce in natural habitats occur more frequently? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.