Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search

By Melina A. Kunar, Stephen Flusberg and Jeremy M. Wolf


Previous studies have shown that the efficiency of visual search does not improve when participants search\ud through the same unchanging display for hundreds of trials (repeated search), even though the participants have\ud a clear memory of the search display. In this article, we ask two important questions. First, why do participants\ud not use memory to help search the repeated display? Second, can context be introduced so that participants are\ud able to guide their attention to the relevant repeated items? Experiments 1–4 show that participants choose not\ud to use a memory strategy because, under these conditions, repeated memory search is actually less efficient than\ud repeated visual search, even though the latter task is in itself relatively inefficient. However, when the visual\ud search task is given context, so that only a subset of the items are ever pertinent, participants can learn to restrict\ud their attention to the relevant stimuli (Experiments 5 and 6)

Topics: BF
Publisher: Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. doi
  2. (1999). Attention and automaticity: Toward a theoretical integration. doi
  3. (1992). Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity. doi
  4. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. doi
  5. (2006). Contextual cueing by global features. doi
  6. (1998). Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. doi
  7. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. I. Detection, search and attention. doi
  8. (1998). Decomposing Visual Search: Evidence of Multiple Item-Specific Skills. doi
  9. (2007). Does contextual cueing guide the deployment of attention? doi
  10. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. doi
  11. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the Feature Integration model for visual search. doi
  12. (1975). Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies. doi
  13. (2006). Object-based inhibitory priming in preview search: Evidence from the ‘top-up’ procedure. doi
  14. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. doi
  15. (1979). On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. doi
  16. (2004). Panoramic search: The interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene. doi
  17. (2000). Post-attentive vision. doi
  18. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. doi
  19. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. doi
  20. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies, doi
  21. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. doi
  22. (1998). What do 1,000,000 trials tell us about visual search? doi
  23. (2005). When we use context in contextual cueing: Evidence from multiple target locations. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.