Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

What is the object of the encapsulation of a process?

By David Tall, M. Thomas, G. Davis, Edward Martin Gray and Adrian Simpson


Several theories have been proposed to describe the transition from process to object in mathematical thinking. Yet, what is the nature of this ''object'' produced by the ''encapsulation'' of a process? Here, we outline the development of some of the theories (including Piaget, Dienes, Davis, Greeno, Dubinsky, Sfard, Gray, and Tall) and consider the nature of the mental objects (apparently) produced through encapsulation and their role in the wider development of mathematical thinking. Does the same developmental route occur in geometry as in arithmetic and algebra? Is the same development used in axiomatic mathematics? What is the role played by imagery?\ud \u

Topics: QA, BF
Publisher: Pergamon
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1991). (in press) Knowledge Construction and diverging thinking in elementary and advanced mathematics, Educational Studies in Mathematics. (to appear). doi
  2. (1988). A Conceptual Approach to the Early Learning of Algebra Using a Computer, Ph.D. Thesis,
  3. (1940). A Mathematician’s Apology (2nd edition, doi
  4. (1960). Building up Mathematics,
  5. (1993). Can You Count On It? Video available from Mathematics Education Research Centre,
  6. (1983). Complex Mathematical Cognition.
  7. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with special reference to limits and continuity, doi
  8. (1983). Conceptual Entities. In Dedre Gentner, Albert L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models,
  9. (1997). Development of Students' doi
  10. (1994). Duality, Ambiguity and Flexibility: A Proceptual View of Simple Arithmetic, doi
  11. (1991). Encouraging Versatile Thinking in Algebra using the Computer, doi
  12. (1993). Fluency in a discourse or manipulation of mental objects,
  13. (1996). Imagery and the description of spatial configurations. doi
  14. (1997). In the Mind … What can imagery tell us about success and failure in arithmetic?
  15. (1979). Intelligence, Learning and Action, doi
  16. (1991). Intuition and rigour: the role of visualization in the calculus.
  17. (1984). Learning mathematics: the cognitive science approach to mathematics education. doi
  18. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. doi
  19. (1991). On the Dual Nature of Mathematical Conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin, doi
  20. (1992). Operational origins of mathematical objects and the quandary of reification—the case of function.
  21. (1987). Preliminaries in any Theory of Representation. doi
  22. (1978). Principles of Categorization. In doi
  23. (1986). Reflective Abstraction and Computer Experiences: A new approach to teaching theoretical mathematics,
  24. (1991). Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematical Thinking. doi
  25. (1994). Reification as the Birth of Metaphor. doi
  26. (1986). Structure and Insight.
  27. (1985). The Equilibrium of Cognitive Structures. Cambridge MA:
  28. (1992). The Learning and Teaching of School Algebra. doi
  29. (1972). The Principles of Genetic Epistemology. doi
  30. (1988). The Student’s Construction of Quantification.
  31. (1989). Transition from Operational to Structural Conception: The notion of function revisited.
  32. (1985). Understanding the calculus, doi
  33. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a co-ordinated process schema. doi
  34. (1997). Using the Computer to Improve Conceptual Thinking in Integration,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.