Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

New Labour ambiguity, or Neo-liberal consistency? The debate about racial inequality in employment and the use of contract compliance

By Michael Orton and Peter Ratcliffe

Abstract

Many historical studies, some of them comparative, have explored the foundations of welfare states and the birth of unemployment policies in Europe in the late nineteenth century. Nearly all have focused on political debate at national level. This paper bases its analysis on labour market reforms initiated in Strasbourg and Liverpool in the decades preceding World War I. It explores how bona fide unemployed workers, the proper clients of official help, were distinguished from the mass of the poor and indigent. The labour market had to be defined and organized before policies for the unemployed could be put in place. The object is to demonstrate not only how this was done, but also how different perceptions of social justice and economic efficiency influenced both the process and the outcomes of public interventions, in this instance undermining attempts to transfer specific policies from one country to another

Topics: HD
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:493

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). Changing patterns of ethnic disadvantage doi
  2. (2002). Contract compliance: subnational and European influences in Northern Ireland’, doi
  3. (1998). Contracting for services – a double jeopardy? An analysis of contract compliance in the context of European and UK social and public procurement policy’, doi
  4. D e a n ,H .( 2002a), Welfare Rights and Social Policy,H a r l o w :P r e n t i c eH a l l . doi
  5. D e a n ,H .( 2002b), ‘Business versus families: whose side is New Labour on?’, doi
  6. (2004). Dissolving the public realm? The logics and limits of neo-liberalism’, doi
  7. (1989). Equal opportunity in the private sector: the limits of voluntarism’,
  8. (2003). Ethnic Minorities and the Labour Market: Final Report, London: Cabinet Office.
  9. (2003). Facts About Men and Women
  10. (2000). Issues of fairness in recruitment processes: a case study of local government practice’, doi
  11. (2002). Key Indicators of Women’s Position in Britain,L o n d o n
  12. (2001). Labour market participation of ethnic groups’,
  13. (1998). Lean supply: a strategy for Best Value in local government procurement?’, doi
  14. (1999). M a r t i n ,S . ,H a r t l e y ,K .a n dC o x ,A .( doi
  15. (1990). Markets, citizenship and the welfare state: some critical reflections’, in
  16. (1999). Minority procurement: beyond affirmative action to economic empowerment’, doi
  17. (1989). Monitoringequal opportunities policies: principles and practice’,
  18. (2001). New Labour: a study in ambiguity from a position of ambivalence’, doi
  19. (2002). New Labour’s white heart: doi
  20. (2003). Office of the Deputy Prime Minister doi
  21. P h i l l i p s ,A .( 1999), Which Equalities Matter?,C a m b r i d g e :P o l i t yP r e s s .
  22. (2002). Poverty and prosperity amongst Britain’s ethnic minorities’,
  23. (2003). Progressing the equality agenda in Northern Ireland’, doi
  24. (2002). Public procurement and anti-discrimination legislation’, in I. Chopin
  25. (2002). Public procurement and supply management strategies’, doi
  26. (2003). Race Equality and Public Procurement: A Guide for Public Authorities and Contractors,L o n d o n
  27. (1995). Race-based affirmative action: mend it or end it?’,
  28. (2004). Race, employment and contract compliance: a way forward for local authorities?’, doi
  29. (2004). Race, Ethnicity and Difference: Imagining the Inclusive Society, doi
  30. (1995). Retreat from equal opportunity? The case of affirmative action’,
  31. (2000). Reviving Local Democracy, doi
  32. (1991). T a y l o r ,B .R .( doi
  33. (1984). T h eM y t ho fB l a c kP r o g r e s s , Cambridge:
  34. (2002). The Duty to Promote Race Equality: A Guide for Public Authorities,L o n d o n
  35. (2000). The Future of Multi-Ethnic
  36. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State,C a m b r i d g e :P o l i t yP r e s s . doi
  37. (2001). The Kingsmill Review of Women’s Pay and Employment, London: Cabinet Office,
  38. (2003). The Scarman Report, the Macpherson Report and the media: how newspapers respond to race-centred social policy interventions’, doi
  39. Transport, Local Government and the Regions (2001a), Delivering Better Services for Citizens – A Review of Local Government Procurement in
  40. Transport, Local Government and the Regions (2001b), Local Authority Procurement: A Research Report,L o n d o n
  41. (2001). What works and for whom? The competing rationalities of “best value”’, doi
  42. (2003). Working for an Inclusive Britain: an Evaluation of the West Midlands Pilot Project, Sandwell: West Midlands Forum.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.