Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support : a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery

By Jeremy Dale, Isabela Caramlau, Andrea Docherty, Jackie Sturt and Hilary Hearnshaw


Background: There is increasing interest in developing peer-led and 'expert patient'-type interventions, particularly to meet the support and informational needs of those with long term conditions, leading to improved clinical outcomes, and pressure relief on mainstream health services. There is also increasing interest in telephone support, due to its greater accessibility and potential availability than face to face provided support. The evidence base for peer telephone interventions is relatively weak, although such services are widely available as support lines provided by user groups and other charitable services.\ud Methods/Design: In a 3-arm RCT, participants are allocated to either an intervention group with Telecare service provided by a Diabetes Specialist Nurse (DSN), an intervention group with service provided by a peer supporter (also living with diabetes), or a control group receiving routine care only. All supporters underwent a 2-day training in motivational interviewing, empowerment and active listening skills to provide telephone support over a period of up to 6 months to adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes who had been recommended a change in diabetes management (i.e. medication and/or lifestyle\ud changes) by their general practitioner (GP). The primary outcome is self-efficacy; secondary outcomes include HbA1c, total and HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, body mass index, and adherence to treatment. 375 participants (125 in each arm) were sought from GP practices across West Midlands, to detect a difference in self-efficacy scores with an effect size of 0.35, 80% power, and 5% significance level. Adults\ud living with type 2 diabetes, with an HbA1c > 8% and not taking insulin were initially eligible. A protocol\ud change 10 months into the recruitment resulted in a change of eligibility by reducing HbA1c to > 7.4%. Several qualitative studies are being conducted alongside the main RCT to describe patient, telecare supporter and practice nurse experience of the trial. \ud Discussion and implications of the research: With its focus on self-management and telephone peer support, the intervention being trialled has the potential to support improved self-efficacy and patient experience, improved clinical outcomes and a reduction in diabetes-related complications

Topics: R1
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). Adherence to prescribed oral hypoglycaemic medication in a population of patients with Type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetic Medicine doi
  2. (1999). BJ: Behavioural sciences in diabetes. Contributions and opportunities. Diabetes Care
  3. (2000). CC: A randomised controlled study of the Arthritis Self Management Programme in the UK. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice
  4. (1995). CE: Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care doi
  5. Council: Medical Research Council framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health doi
  6. (2004). Diabetes in the UK. doi
  7. (1998). Eakin EG: Issues in diabetes self management.
  8. (2000). Efficacy of nurse telehealth care and peer support in augmenting treatment of depression in primary care. Archives of Family Medicine
  9. (2000). EH: Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews doi
  10. (2000). for Reviews and dissemination University of York: Complications of diabetes: renal disease and promotion of self management. Effective Health Care Bulletin
  11. (2002). Health Behavior Change: a guide for practitioners London: Churchill Livingstone; doi
  12. (1996). Health Psychology Buckingham: doi
  13. (2001). Health: The Expert Patient: A new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st Century. London
  14. (2003). Hearnshaw H: Measuring Outcomes: self-management, empowerment and self-efficacy. Diabetic Medicine
  15. Outcomes Framework Guidance doi
  16. (2004). Patient experience of care, patient and health professional views on diabetes interventions and the findings of a telecare trial.
  17. (2000). Po: Telemedicine to improve patients' self efficacy in managing diabetes. doi
  18. Psychological aspects of the health care process
  19. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. doi
  20. (2000). RE: The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care doi
  21. (2005). S: Education for people with type 2 diabetes: What do patients want?
  22. (2001). Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Education and Counselling doi
  23. (1993). Starz T: Perceived Treatment Efficacy: Assessment
  24. (2000). Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews doi
  25. (2000). The Art of Empowerment Alexandria:
  26. (1998). The skilled helper: a systematic approach to effective helping Pacific Grove: CA: Brooks/Cole;
  27. (1999). The Wessex starting insulin study: patient follow up.
  28. (2000). Toobert DJ: Brief, computer-assisted diabetes dietary self management counselling. Effects on behaviour, physiologic outcomes and quality of life. Medical Care doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.