Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Using mixed methods for analysing culture : The Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion project

By Elizabeth Silva, David Wright and Alan Warde

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of material generated in a mixed method investigation into cultural tastes and practices, conducted in Britain from 2003 to 2006, which employed a survey, focus groups and household interviews. The study analysed the patterning of cultural life across a number of fields, enhancing the empirical and methodological template provided by Bourdieu’s Distinction. Here we discuss criticisms of Bourdieu emerging from subsequent studies of class, culture and taste, outline the arguments related to the use of mixed methods and present illustrative results from the analysis of these different types of data. We discuss how the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods informed our analysis of cultural life in contemporary Britain. No single method was able to shed light on all aspects of our inquiry, lending support to the view that mixing methods is the most productive strategy for the investigation of complex social phenomena

Topics: HT
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:549

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2005).’Problems in comparative research: The example of omnivorousness’, doi
  2. (2004). Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion. doi
  3. (1997). Distinction in America? Recovering Bourdieu’s theory of taste from its critics’, doi
  4. (1984). Distinction. doi
  5. (2008). Does taste still serve power: The fate of distinction in
  6. (2005). Foundations of Pierre Bourdieu’s class analysis’ in E.O. Wright (ed), Approaches to Class analysis, Cambridge, doi
  7. (2004). Geometric Data Analysis: From Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis, doi
  8. (2005). Household Study:
  9. (1993). Inside Culture. Art and Class in the American Home. Chicago and London: doi
  10. (2004). Introduction. Common threads among techniques of data analysis’ doi
  11. (1995). London: National Centre for Social Research. http://www.open.ac.uk/socialsciences/cultural-capital-and-social-exclusion/projectpublications.php
  12. (2008). Models of Openness to Cultural Diversity: Humanist, Populist, doi
  13. (1992). Money, Morals and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class, doi
  14. (2004). Operationalizing Bourdieu on Capitals: A Discussion on “The Construction of the Object”’. ESRC Research Methods Programme. Working Paper 7,
  15. (1996). Qualitative Researching. doi
  16. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration’ in Brannen,
  17. (2003). Social capital and social exclusion in England and Wales’, doi
  18. (1999). Sociological Research Methods in Context.
  19. (1996). Television and Society,
  20. (2008). The omnivorous orientation in the UK’, doi
  21. (2003). Trends in social capital: membership of associations in England and Wales’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.