Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Academic attainment and special educational needs in extremely preterm children at 11 years of age : the EPICure Study

By Samantha J. Johnson, Enid M. Hennessy, R. (Rebecca) Smith, Rebecca Trikic, Dieter Wolke and Neil Marlow

Abstract

Aim: To assess academic attainment and special educational needs (SEN) in extremely preterm (EP) children in middle childhood. \ud \ud Methods: Of 307 EP (=25 weeks) survivors born in the UK and Ireland in 1995, 219 (71%) were re-assessed at 11 years, with a comparison group of 153 classmates born at term, using standardised tests of cognitive ability and academic attainment and teacher reports of school performance and special educational needs (SEN). Multiple imputation was used to correct for selective dropout. \ud \ud Results: EP children had significantly lower scores than classmates for cognitive ability (-20 points; 95%CI: -23,-17), reading (-18 points; -22,-15) and mathematics (-27 points; -31,-23). Twenty-nine (13%) EP children attended special school. In mainstream schools, 105 (57%) EP children had SEN (OR: 10; 6, 18) and 103 (55%) required SEN resource provision (OR: 10; 5, 18). Teachers rated 50% of EP children with attainment below the average range compared with 5% of classmates (OR: 18; CI: 8, 41). EP children who are entered for mainstream education an academic year early due to preterm birth had similar academic attainment but required more SEN support (OR: 2; 1.1,3.8). \ud \ud Conclusions: EP survivors remain at high risk for learning impairments and poor academic attainment in middle childhood. A significant proportion require full-time specialist education and over half of those attending mainstream schools require additional health or educational resources in order to access the national curriculum. The prevalence and impact of SEN is likely to increase as these children approach the transition to secondary school.\ud \ud \ud --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ud \u

Topics: R1, LB
Publisher: BMJ Group
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:566

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. Abnormal cerebral structure is present at term in premature infants.
  2. Abnormal cortical development after premature birth shown by altered allometric scaling of brain growth. doi
  3. (1998). and behavioural outcomes at 7 to 8 years in a national very low birthweight cohort. doi
  4. (1983). Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc; doi
  5. Behavioural problems in children who weight 1000g or less at birth in four countries. doi
  6. (2008). Children Schools and Families. Special Educational Needs in doi
  7. Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and special health care needs of school-aged chldiren born with extremely low-birth-weight in the 1990s. doi
  8. Cognitive ability and school performance of extremely low birth weight children and matched term control children at age 8 years: A regional study. doi
  9. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm. A meta-analysis. doi
  10. Cognitive and behavioural outcomes following very preterm birth. doi
  11. (1998). Cognitive and educational outcome of verylow-birthweight children in early adolescence. doi
  12. (1999). Cognitive status, language attainment, and prereading skills of 6-year-old very preterm children and their peers: the Bavarian Longitudinal Study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology doi
  13. (2006). Educational and therapeutic resource dependency at early school-age in children who were born very preterm. Early Human Development doi
  14. Educational outcome at 8 years for chidlren who were born extremely prematurely: A controlled study. doi
  15. Entwicklungslanzeitfolgen bei ehemaligen, sehr unreifen Fruhgeborenen. Monatsschrift fur Kinderheilkunde 2001;(Suppl 1) 149:S53-S61. doi
  16. (2000). Extreme prematurity and school outcomes. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology doi
  17. (2009). Health and school performance of teenagers born before 29 weeks gestation.
  18. (1997). How do season of birth and length of schooling affect children's attainment at Key Stage 1? A question revisited. doi
  19. (1992). Impact of a matched term control group on interpretation of developmental performance in preterm infants.
  20. (2009). Longitudinal, 15-year follow-up of chidlren born at less than 29 weeks' gestation after introduction of surfactant therapy into a region: Neurologic, cognitive, and educational outcomes. Pediatrics 2002;110(6):1094-1102. on 26 doi
  21. (1990). Mathematical knowledge of Japanese, Chinese and American Elementary school children.
  22. (1993). Mathematiktest fuer Grundschulkinder [Math test for elementary school children]. Munich: Bavarian Longitudinal Study;
  23. Middle school-age outcomes in children with very low birth-weight. doi
  24. Motor and executive function at 6 years of age following extremely preterm birth. doi
  25. Neuordevelopmental disability through 11 years in extremely preterm: The EPICure Study. doi
  26. Neurobehavioral outcomes of school-age children born extremely low birth weight or very preterm in the 1990s. doi
  27. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. The New England doi
  28. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. doi
  29. (2005). Office for National Statistics. The National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification User Manual.: Palgrave Macmillan;
  30. Outcome at 14 years of extremely low birthweight infants: a regional study. doi
  31. Pattern of learning disabilities in children with extremely low birth weight and broadly average intelligence. doi
  32. Persistent infant crying and hyperactivity problems in middle childhood. doi
  33. (2008). Pervasive Behavior Problems at 6 Years of Age in a Total-Population Sample of Children Born at <25 Weeks of Gestation. Pediatrics doi
  34. Psychosocial and academic characteristics of extremely low birth weight (<800g) adolescents who are free of major impairment compared with term-born control subjects. doi
  35. (2009). Pushing the boundaries of viability: The economic impact of extreme preterm birth. Early Human Development 2006;82:77-84. on 26 doi
  36. Regional brain volume abnormalities and long-term cognitive outcome in preterm infants.
  37. School difficulties at adolescence in a regiional cohort of children who were extremely low birth weight. doi
  38. School level at 10 years of age in children who required neonatal intensive care in 1980-1989. doi
  39. School-age outcomes in children who were extremely low birth weight from four international populationbased cohorts. doi
  40. (1994). SchoolAge Outcomes In
  41. (1994). Schoolage outcomes in children with birth weights under 750g. New England doi
  42. (1999). Searching for justice: the discovery of IQ gains over time. doi
  43. (1996). Season of birth, sex and success in GCSE English, mathematics and science: some long-lasting effects from the early years? Research Papers in Education doi
  44. Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at 7 years. doi
  45. (2004). Special education services and school performance in a regional cohort of low-birthweight infants at age nine. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology doi
  46. Specific language difficulties and school achievement in children born at 25 weeks of gestation or less. doi
  47. The cognitive outcome of very preterm infants may be poorer than often reported: an empirical investigation of how methodological issues make a big difference. doi
  48. The EPICure Study: Outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. doi
  49. (2004). The neurodevelopmental progress of infants less than 33 weeks into adolescence. Archives Of Disease In Childhood doi
  50. (2008). Update: Multiple imputation of missing values.
  51. (2004). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, 2nd Edition UK: doi
  52. Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from National Curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.