Location of Repository

Prediction of depression in European general practice attendees: the PREDICT study

By Michael King, Scott Weich, Francisco Torres-González, Igor Švab, Heidi-Ingrid Maaroos, Jan Neeleman, Miguel Xavier, Richard Morris, Carl Walker, Juan A. Bellón-Saameño, Berta Moreno-Küstner, Danica Rotar, Janez Rifel, Anu Aluoja, Ruth Kalda, Mirjam I. Geerlings, Idalmiro Carraça, Manuel Caldas de Almeida, Benjamin Vicente, Sandra Saldivia, Pedro Rioseco and Irwin Nazareth

Abstract

Background\ud Prevention of depression must address multiple risk factors. Estimating overall risk across a range of putative risk factors is fundamental to prevention of depression. However, we lack reliable and valid methods of risk estimation. This protocol paper introduces PREDICT, an international research study to address this risk estimation.\ud \ud Methods/design\ud This is a prospective study in which consecutive general practice attendees in six European countries are recruited and followed up after six and 12 months. Prevalence of depression is assessed at baseline and each follow-up point. Consecutive attendees between April 2003 and September 2004 who were aged 18 to 75 were asked to take part. The possibility of a depressive episode was assessed using the Depression Section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. A selection of presumed risk factors was based on our previous work and a systematic review of the literature. It was necessary to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a number of risk factor questions that were developed specifically, or adapted, for the PREDICT study. In a separate reliability study conducted between January and November 2003, consecutive general practice attendees in the six participating European countries completed the risk factor items on two occasions, two weeks apart. The overall response rate at entry to the study was 69%. We exceeded our expected recruitment rate, achieving a total of 10,048 people in all. Reliability coefficients were generally good to excellent.\ud \ud Discussion\ud Response rate to follow-up in all countries was uniformly high, which suggests that prediction will be based on almost a full cohort. The results of our reliability analysis are encouraging and suggest that data collected during the course of PREDICT will have a satisfactory level of stability. The development of a multi-factor risk score for depression will lay the foundation for future research on risk reduction in primary care. Our data will also provide the necessary evidence base on which to develop and evaluate interventions to reduce the prevalence of depression.\ud \u

Topics: R1
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:584

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1997). A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med doi
  2. (1999). A simple computer program for guiding management of cardiovascular risk factors and prescribing. BMJ doi
  3. (1997). A: Do socio-economic risk factors predict the incidence and maintenance of psychiatric disorder in primary care? Psychol Med doi
  4. (1997). A: Strategies for the prevention of psychiatric disorder in primary care in south London. doi
  5. (1995). A: The Royal Free interview for religious and spiritual beliefs: development and standardization. Psychol Med doi
  6. (1997). AD: Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet doi
  7. (1987). AH: Affective disorders and mortality. A general population study. Arch Gen Psychiatry
  8. (1998). and common mental disorders: population based cohort study. BMJ doi
  9. (2003). Ansseau M: Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis".
  10. (2005). Collecting genetic information in primary care: evaluating a new family history tool. Fam Pract
  11. (1992). Common mental disorders: a bio-social model London, doi
  12. (1988). DA: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. An epidemiologic Instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiatry
  13. (1981). Depressionrelated cognitions: antecedent or consequence? J Abnorm Psychol
  14. (1993). deviance and minor psychiatric morbidity in the community. A population-based approach to General Health Questionnaire data in the Health and Lifestyle Survey. Psychol Med doi
  15. (2003). Discrimination and delusional ideation. doi
  16. (1999). Distribucion de los trastornos mentales en un area de salud mentale de Granada segun niveles de asistencia. Apysam
  17. (1995). Division: The Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households London: doi
  18. (1995). Fundamentals of biostatistics 4th edition.
  19. (1997). G: Mental health in primary care. An epidemiological study of morbidity and use of health resources. doi
  20. (1989). GR: Health measurement scales Oxford doi
  21. (1994). Haggerty RJ: Reducing risks for mental disorders: frontiers for preventive intervention research doi
  22. (1990). Health and Lifestyles Routledge, doi
  23. (2003). Health survey for England 2002: a survey carried out on behalf of the Department of Health. The health of children and young people Volume 1. The Stationery Office: London;
  24. (1995). Initial reliability and validity of the childhood trauma interview: a new multidimensional measure of childhood interpersonal trauma. doi
  25. (1995). Kristal A: Invited commentary: symposium on community intervention trials.
  26. (1988). Kupfer DJ: Assessment of sexual function in depressed, impotent, and healthy men: factor analysis of a Brief Sexual Function Questionnaire for men. Psychiatry Res doi
  27. (1999). Marmot MG: Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: prospective results from the Whitehall II Study. Occup Environ Med doi
  28. (1998). Material standard of living, social class, and the prevalence of the common mental disorders in Great Britain. doi
  29. (1993). Mental disorder and the strategies of prevention. Psychol Med doi
  30. (1986). Minor psychiatric morbidity and general practice consultation: the West London Survey. Psychol Med Monogr doi
  31. (2000). MJ: GP frequent attendance in Liverpool and Granada: the impact of depressive symptoms.
  32. (1995). OPCS Surveys of Psychiatric Morbidity in Great Britain. Report No 1. The prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among adults aged 16–64 living in private households in Great Britain HMSO: London;
  33. (1997). Organisation: Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). doi
  34. (1990). Personality disorder and social functioning. In Measuring Human Problems: a Practical Guide Edited by: Peck DF,
  35. (1991). PJ: Poverty and psychiatric status. Longitudinal evidence from the New Haven Epidemiologic Catchment Area study. Arch Gen Psychiatry doi
  36. (1988). Psychiatric disorder and limitations in physical functioning in a sample of the Los Angeles general population.
  37. (1994). Social and physical health risk factors for first-onset major depressive disorder in a community sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol
  38. (1998). Social roles and gender difference in the prevalence of common mental disorders. doi
  39. (2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions 3rd edition. doi
  40. (1989). The alcohol use disorders identification test: Guidelines for the use in primary health care World Health Organisation: Geneva;
  41. (1993). The course and outcome of depression in different cultures: 10-year follow-up of the WHO Collaborative Study on the Assessment of Depressive Disorders. Psychol Med doi
  42. (1985). The List of Threatening Experiences: a subset of 12 life event categories with considerable long-term contextual threat. Psychol Med doi
  43. (1990). Theorell T: Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life Basic Books: doi
  44. (1997). Üstün TB: Preventing mental illness: mental health promotion in primary care Chichester: doi
  45. (1993). vanden Brink W: Outcome of depression and anxiety in primary care. A three-wave 3 1/2-year study of psychopathology and disability. Arch Gen Psychiatry doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.