Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Topographic determinants of foot and mouth disease transmission in the UK 2001 epidemic

By Nicholas J. Savill, Darren J. Shaw, Rob Deardon, Michael J. Tildesley, Matthew James Keeling, Mark E. J. Woolhouse, Stephan P. Brooks and Bryan T. Grenfell


Background\ud A key challenge for modelling infectious disease dynamics is to understand the spatial spread of infection in real landscapes. This ideally requires a parallel record of spatial epidemic spread and a detailed map of susceptible host density along with relevant transport links and geographical features.\ud \ud Results\ud Here we analyse the most detailed such data to date arising from the UK 2001 foot and mouth epidemic. We show that Euclidean distance between infectious and susceptible premises is a better predictor of transmission risk than shortest and quickest routes via road, except where major geographical features intervene.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud Thus, a simple spatial transmission kernel based on Euclidean distance suffices in most regions, probably reflecting the multiplicity of transmission routes during the epidemic.\ud \u

Topics: SF, QL
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2006
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1962). A theorem on boolean matrices. doi
  2. (1986). AI: Exposure of sheep to natural aerosols of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Res Vet Sci
  3. (2003). AJM: The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease. doi
  4. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs FMD Data archive.
  5. (2001). Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in great britain: the first five months. Vet Rec
  6. (1968). Excretion of foot-and-mouth disease virus prior to the development of lesions. Vet Rec
  7. (2002). Foot and mouth disease 2001: Lessons to be learned inquiry The Stationary Office,
  8. (1987). Infection of cattle by airborne foot-and-mouth disease virus: minimal doses with O1 and SAT 2 strains. Res Vet Sci
  9. (2001). The foot-and-mouth epidemic in Great Britain: Pattern of spread and impact of interventions. Science doi
  10. (2005). Thrusfield MV: A review of foot-andmouth disease with special consideration for the clinical and epidemiological factors relevant to predictive modelling of the disease. Vet J doi
  11. (2001). Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain. Nature doi
  12. (2001). UK foot and mouth epidemic: Stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Science

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.