Location of Repository

The effect of stimulus range on two-interval frequency discrimination

By William J. Matthews and Neil Stewart

Abstract

It has traditionally been thought that performance in two-interval frequency discrimination tasks decreases as the range over which the standard tone varies is increased. Recent empirical evidence and a reexamination of previous results suggest that this may not be the case. The present experiment found that performance was significantly better when the standard roved over a wide range (1500 Hz) than a narrow range (30 Hz). This pattern cannot readily be accommodated by traditional models of frequency discrimination based on memory or attention, but may be explicable in terms of neural plasticity and the formation of perceptual anchors. \u

Topics: RC0321, BF
Publisher: Acoustical Society of America
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:605

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1975). A probe-signal investigation of uncertainfrequency detection,”
  2. (1995). Auditory attentional bandwidth: Effect of level and frequency range,” doi
  3. (2005). Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability,” Perception Psychophys. doi
  4. (1990). Classical conditioning induces CS-specific receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig,” Brain Res. doi
  5. (2006). Dyslexia and the failure to form a perceptual anchor,” doi
  6. (1970). Forgetting: Interference or decay?,” doi
  7. (1974). Intensity and frequency discrimination in one- and two-interval paradigms,” doi
  8. (1969). Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution,” doi
  9. (1973). Intensity perception. IV. Resolution in roving- level discrimination,” doi
  10. (1977). Intensity perception. VII. Further data on roving-level discrimination and the resolution and bias edge effects,” doi
  11. (1984). Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context coding,” doi
  12. (1972). Memory effects in the method of absolute judgment,” doi
  13. (2004). Pitch perception and retention: Two cumulative benefits of selective attention,” Perception Psychophys. doi
  14. (2000). Proactive interference of a sequence of tones in a two-tone pitch comparison task,” doi
  15. (1974). Pure-tone intensity discrimination: some experiments relating to the “near-miss” to Weber‟s law,” doi
  16. (2004). Specific long-term memory traces in primary auditory cortex,” doi
  17. (1952). The decline of pitch discrimination with time,” doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.