Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Absolute identification is relative: a reply to Brown, Marley, and Lacouture (2007)

By Neil Stewart

Abstract

N. Stewart, G. D. A. Brown, and N. Chater presented a relative judgment model (RJM) of absolute identification, in which the current stimulus is judged relative to the preceding stimulus. S. Brown, A. A. J. Marley, and Y. Lacouture found that the RJM does not predict their finding of increased accuracy after large stimulus jumps, except at the expense of other effects. In fact, the RJM does predict both the core effects and increased accuracy after large jumps (although it underestimates this effect) when better constrained parameters are estimated from the trial-by-trial raw data rather than from summary plots. Further, a modified RJM, in which the stimulus from two trials ago is sometimes used as a referent, provides a better fit

Topics: BF
Publisher: American Psychological Association
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:609

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1984). A fixed rehearsal capacity interpretation of limits onAbsolute Identification 14 absolute identification performance. doi
  2. (1997). A limited capacity, wave equality, random walk model of absolute identification. In
  3. (2002). A ratio model of scale-invariant memory and identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  4. (1965). A simplex method for function minimization. doi
  5. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment. doi
  6. (2005). An exemplar account of the bow and set size effects in absolute identification. doi
  7. (1997). An exemplar-based random-walk model of speeded categorization and absolute judgment. doi
  8. (1976). Attention bands in absolute identification. doi
  9. (1997). Bow, range, and sequential effects in absolute identification: A response-time analysis. doi
  10. (2004). Choice and response time processes in the identification and categorization of unidimensional stimuli. doi
  11. (1969). Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. doi
  12. (1980). Intensity perception. X. Effect of preceding stimulus on identification performance. doi
  13. (2007). Is absolute identification always relative? Reply to Stewart, Brown, and Chater doi
  14. (2004). Learning in a unidimensional absolute identification task. doi
  15. (1972). Memory effects in the method of absolute judgment. doi
  16. (2004). Sequence effects in categorizing tones varying in frequency. doi
  17. (1983). Shifts of attention in the identification and discrimination of intensity. doi
  18. (1957). Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. doi
  19. (1982). The bow and sequential effects in absolute identification. doi
  20. (2005). The dynamics of scaling: A memory-based anchor model of category rating and absolute identification. doi
  21. (1984). The relativity of "absolute" judgements. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.