Location of Repository

Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli.

By Neil Stewart, G. D. A. Brown and Mick Chater


Categorization research typically assumes that the cognitive system has access to a (more or less noisy) representation of the absolute magnitudes of the properties of stimuli and that this information is used in reaching a categorization decision. However, research on identification of simple perceptual stimuli suggests that people have very poor representations of absolute magnitude information and that judgments about absolute magnitude are strongly influenced by preceding material. The experiments presented here investigate such sequence effects in categorization tasks. Strong sequence effects were found. Classification of a borderline stimulus was more accurate when preceded by a distant member of the opposite category than by a distant member of the same category. It is argued that this category contrast effect cannot be accounted for by extant exemplar or decision-bound models of categorization. The effect suggests the use of relative magnitude information in categorization. A memory and contrast model illustrates how relative magnitude information may be used in categorization

Topics: BF
Publisher: American Psychological Association
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:619

Suggested articles



  1. (1989). A limited−capacity response process in absolute identification. doi
  2. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. doi
  3. (1964). Adaptation−level theory. doi
  4. (1997). An exemplar−based random walk model of speeded classification. doi
  5. (1953). An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness. doi
  6. (1986). Attention, similarity and the identification−categorizationSequence Effects 26 relationship. doi
  7. (1997). Bow, range, and sequential effects in absolute identification: A response−time analysis. doi
  8. (1994). Classification and cognition. doi
  9. (1993). Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization. doi
  10. (1954). Context effects and the validity of loudness scales. doi
  11. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. doi
  12. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. doi
  13. (1995). Effect of memory decay on predictions from changing categories. doi
  14. (1959). Individual choice behavior. doi
  15. (1980). Intensity perception. X. Effect of preceding stimulus on identification performance. doi
  16. (1981). Inter−trial effects of same−different judgements. doi
  17. (1999). Learning about categories in the absence of training: Profound amnesia and the relationship between perceptual categorization and recognition memory. doi
  18. (1980). On sequential effects in absolute judgment experiments. doi
  19. (1999). On the nature of implicit categorization. doi
  20. (1985). Overall similarity and the identification of separable− dimension stimuli: A choice model analysis. doi
  21. (2001). Perceptual categorization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  22. (1994). Presentation order and recognition of categorically related examples. doi
  23. (1995). Pure feedback effects in absolute identification. doi
  24. (1971). Response system processes in absolute judgment. doi
  25. (1970). Sequential effect and memory in category judgment. doi
  26. (1968). Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. doi
  27. (1984). Sequential predictors of choice in psychophysical tasks.
  28. (1985). Spontaneous alternation behavior. doi
  29. (1982). The bow and sequential effects in absolute identification. doi
  30. (1985). The magical number seven and some other features of category scaling: Properties for a model of absolute judgment. doi
  31. (1997). The measurement of sensation. London: doi
  32. The research was partly funded by a Graduate Assistantship awarded to the first author by the University of Warwick, a Leverhulme Trust Grant (#F/215/AY) awarded to the Gordon
  33. (1980). Variability and sequential effects in cross−modality matching of area and loudness. doi
  34. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. doi
  35. (1997). Why is it difficult to learn absolute judgment tasks? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.