Location of Repository

The mutual extraction industry: drug use and the normative structure of social capital in the Russian far north \ud \ud

By Hilary Pilkington and El’vira Sharifullina

Abstract

Background\ud The article contributes to the literature on the role of social networks and social capital in young people’s drug use. It considers the structural and cultural dimensions of the ‘risk environment’ of post-Soviet Russia, the micro risk-environment of a deindustrialising city in the far north of the country and the kind of social capital that circulates in young people’s social networks there. Its focus is thus on social capital at the micro-level, the ‘bridging’ networks of peer friendship groups and the norms that govern them.\ud \ud Method\ud The research is based on a small ethnographic study of the friendship groups and social networks of young people in the city of Vorkuta in 2006–2007. It draws on data from 32 respondents aged 17–27 in the form of 17 semi-structured audio and video interviews and field diaries. Respondents were selected from friendship groups in which drug use was a regular and symbolically significant practice.\ud \ud Results\ud The risk environment of the Russian far north is characterised by major deindustrialisation, poor health indicators, low life expectancy and limited educational and employment opportunities. It is also marked by a ‘work hard, play hard’ cultural ethos inherited from the Soviet period when risk-laden manual labour was well-rewarded materially and symbolically. However, young people today often rely on informal economic practices to generate the resource needed to fulfil their expectations. This is evident from the social networks among respondents which were found to be focused around a daily routine of generating and spending income, central to which is the purchase, sale and use of drugs. These practices are governed by norms that often invert those normally ascribed to social networks: reciprocity is replaced by mutual exploitation and trust by cheating.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud Social networks are central to young people’s management of the risk environment associated with post-Soviet economic transformation. However, such networks are culturally as well as structurally determined and may be sites not only of cooperation, support and trust but also of mutual exploitation, deceit and distrust. This does not imply these regions are devoid of social capital. Rather it suggests that the notion of social capital as a natural by-product of a self-regulating economy and its institutions needs to be reconsidered in the context of local configurations of capital and social relations as well as their cultural and normative context. This reconsideration should include further reflection on whether the kinds of social networks described might be better understood not as motors for the generation of social capital but as sites of its ‘mutual extraction’

Topics: DK, HV
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:639

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2007). Beyond ‘peer pressure’: rethinking drug use and ‘youth culture’. doi
  2. (2002). Crossing the rubicon: youth transitions, poverty, drugs and social exclusion. doi
  3. (2005). Disconnected youth? Growing up in Britain’s poor neighbourhoods. doi
  4. (1998). Drug users' sexual relationships and the social organisation of risk: the sexual relationship as a site of risk management. doi
  5. (1984). Drug, Set, and Setting: The Basis for Controlled Intoxicant Use. New Haven and London: doi
  6. (2002). Drugs and transition. doi
  7. (2000). Economics, social capital and the colonization of the social sciences. In
  8. (1989). Friendship: developing a sociological perspective. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  9. (2003). Hooked on heroin: drugs and drifters in a globalized world. doi
  10. (2003). In search of respect: selling crack in El Barrio. Second Edition. New York: doi
  11. (2000). Informality: social theory and contemporary practice. London and doi
  12. (1991). Language and symbolic Power. Edited and with an introduction by doi
  13. (1988). Living with heroin: the impact of a drugs ‘epidemic’ on an English community. Milton Keynes,
  14. (2005). Living with poverty in post-Soviet Russia: Social perspectives on urban poverty. PhD thesis. London:
  15. (2006). Marginalized for a lifetime. The everyday experiences of gulag survivors in post-Soviet Magadan. doi
  16. (2006). Mezhlichnostnoe doverie v Rossii. Sotsial’naia Real’nost’,
  17. (2002). Navigating Movements: A conversation with Brian Massumi. In M. Zournazi (Ed.) Hope: new philosophies for change. University of Wollongong available on-line at http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1087&context=artspapers
  18. (2001). Networks, resources and risk among women who use drugs. doi
  19. (2003). Norms, social networks, and HIV-related risk behaviours among urban disadvantaged drug users. doi
  20. (2000). On friendship. doi
  21. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: doi
  22. (2005). Rescaling Russia’s geography: the challenges of depopulating the Northern Periphery. doi
  23. (2002). Risking risk: the influence of types of capital and social networks on the injection practices of drug users. doi
  24. (1995). Russia as an hour-glass society: a constitution without citizens.
  25. (1997). Russian-English dictionary of contemporary slang. doi
  26. (2004). Small-Town Russia: Postcommunist Livelihoods and Identities. doi
  27. (2008). Social capital as social relations: the contribution of normative structures. doi
  28. (2005). Social capital. Cambridge:
  29. (2002). Social influences on the transition to injection drug use among young heroin sniffers: a qualitative analysis. doi
  30. (2002). Substance use and social and economic transition: the need for evidence. doi
  31. (2006). Supportive social relationships and adolescent health risk behavior among secondary school students in El Salvador. doi
  32. (1987). The new heroin users.
  33. (1998). The role of social capital in the Russian mortality crisis. doi
  34. (2005). The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. doi
  35. (2005). Transition and the HIV risk environment. doi
  36. (2002). Trust and Trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation: doi
  37. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital doi
  38. (2002). Young people, illicit drug use and the question of normalization. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.