Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Relative judgment and knowledge of the category structure

By Neil Stewart and William J. Matthews

Abstract

For evenly spaced stimuli, a purely relative judgment account of unidimensional categorization performance is trivial: All that is required is knowledge of the size of stimulus difference corresponding to the width of a category. For unevenly spaced stimuli, long-term knowledge of the category structure is required. In the present article, we will argue that such knowledge does not necessitate a direct, absolute mapping between (representations of) stimulus magnitudes and category labels. We will show that Stewart, Brown, and Chater's (2005) relative judgment model can account for data from absolute identification experiments with uneven stimulus spacing

Topics: BF
Publisher: Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:707

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. A fixed rehearsal capacity interpretation of limits on absolute identification performance. doi
  2. A limited capacity rehearsal model for psychological judgments applied to magnitude estimation. doi
  3. (1985). Absolute identification by relative judgment. doi
  4. (2007). Absolute identification is relative: A reply to doi
  5. An exemplar account of the bow and set size effects in absolute identification. doi
  6. An exemplar-based random-walk model of speeded categorization and absolute judgment. In doi
  7. (2008). An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification. doi
  8. Attention bands in absolute identification. doi
  9. Attention, similarity and the identificationcategorization relationship. doi
  10. Choice and response time processes in the identification and categorization of unidimensional stimuli. doi
  11. Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. doi
  12. (2002). Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. doi
  13. (2004). Sequence effects in categorizing tones varying in frequency. doi
  14. (1968). Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. doi
  15. The dynamics of scaling: A memory-based anchor model of category rating and absolute identification. doi
  16. (1997). The measurement of sensation. London: doi
  17. (1984). The relativity of “absolute” judgements. doi
  18. (2002). Top-down gaincontrolintheauditorysystem: Evidencefromidentification and discrimination experiments.
  19. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.