Location of Repository

Differences between European birthweight standards: impact on classification of ‘small for gestational age’

By Karla Hemming, Jane Hutton, S. V. Glinianaia, S. N. Jarvis and M. J. Platt

Abstract

We describe a quantitative and comparative review of a selection of European birthweight standards for gestational age for singletons, to enable appropriate choices to be made for clinical and research use. Differences between median values at term across standards in 10 regions and misclassification of ‘small for gestational age’ (SGA), were studied. Sex and parity differences, exclusion criteria, and methods of construction were considered. There was wide variation between countries in exclusion criteria, methods of calculating standards, and median birthweight at term. The lightest standards (e.g. France's medians are 255g lower than Norway's medians) were associated with fewer exclusion criteria. Up to 20% of the population used in the construction of the Scottish standard would be classified as SGA using the Norwegian standard. Substantial misclassification of SGA is possible. Assumptions about variation used in the construction of some standards were not justified. It is not possible to conclude that there are real differences in birthweight standards between European countries. Country-based standards control for some population features but add misclassification due to the differing ways in which standards are derived. Standards should be chosen to reflect clinical or research need. If standards stratified by sex or parity are not available, adjustments should be made. In multinational studies, comparisons should be made between results using both a common standard and country-based standards

Topics: RJ
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:709

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2000). International variations in intrauterine growth.
  2. (2003). Cerebral palsy and intrauterine growth in single births: a European collaborative study. doi
  3. (1996). Intrauterine growth pattern and risk of childhood onset insulin dependent (type I) diabetes: population based case-control study. doi
  4. (1992). Birthweight and perinatal mortality: the effect of gestational age. doi
  5. (2001). On the importance – and the unimportance – of birthweight. doi
  6. (1983). A comparative analysis of birthweight for gestational age standards. doi
  7. (2001). Comparability of published perinatal mortality rates in Western Europe: the quantitative impact of differences in gestational age and birthweight criteria. doi
  8. (2000). Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE) Collaborative Group. doi
  9. (1997). Selection biases invalidate current low birthweight for gestation standards. doi
  10. (1993). Clinical birthweight standards for a total population in the 1980s. doi
  11. (1991). An update on the Swedish reference standards for weight, length and head circumference at birth for given gestational age (1977–1981). Acta Paediatr Scand 80:756–762. doi
  12. (1995). A birthweight for gestational age standard based on data doi
  13. (1989). Perinatal vaekst. Ugeskr Laeger 151:1813–1815.
  14. (1996). Fetal growth from the AUDIPOG study. I. Establishment of reference curves.
  15. (1988). Curve di accrescimento endouterino da 34 a 42 settimane di gravidanza nella provincia di Sassari. Minerva Pediatr 40:315–319. (In Italian)
  16. (2000). Birthweight by gestational age in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand79:440–449. doi
  17. (1990). Services Common Services Agency. doi
  18. (1987). New birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeks. Early Hum Dev15:45–52. doi
  19. (2002). Birthweight and perinatal mortality: comparison of optimal birthweight in seven Western European countries. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.