Location of Repository

Buyer power in U.K. food retailing: a 'first-pass' test

By Tim Lloyd, Steve McCorriston, C. W. Morgan, A. J. Rayner and Habtu Tadesse Weldegebriel


Habtu Weldegebriel, University of Warwick\ud Abstract\ud The potential existence of buyer power in U.K. food retailing has attracted the scrutiny of the U.K.'s anti-trust authorities, culminating in the second of two comprehensive regulatory inquiries in recent years. Such inquiries are authoritative but correspondingly time-consuming and costly. Moreover, detection of buyer power has been dogged by the paucity of reliable evidence of its existence. In this paper, we present a simple theoretical model of oligopsony which delivers quasi-reduced form retailer-producer pricing equations with which the null of perfect competition can be tested using readily available market data. Using a cointegrated vector autoregression, we find empirical results that show the null of perfect competition can be rejected in seven of the nine food products investigated. Though not conclusive on the existence of buyer power, the proposed test offers a means via which the behaviour of the retail-producer price spread is consistent with it. At the very least, it can corroborate the concerns of the anti-trust authorities as to whether buyer power is potentially one source of concern

Topics: HF
Publisher: Berkeley Electronic Press
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:886

Suggested articles



  1. (1983). A Note on the Effect of Cost Changes on Prices” doi
  2. (2004). An Investigation of the Determinants of Farm-Retail Price Spreads, Final Report to DEFRA by London Economics,
  3. (1998). Approximations to the Asymptotic Distributions of Cointegration Tests” doi
  4. (2002). Buyer Power and Concentration in European Food Retailing, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Competition Commission, doi
  5. (2009). Buyer Power in U.K. Food Retailing Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press,
  6. (1996). Concentration change and countervailing power in the U.S. food manufacturing industries”, doi
  7. (2002). Do Coffee Roasters Benefit from High Prices of doi
  8. (1992). Empirical methods of identifying and measuring market power”,
  9. (1989). Empirical Studies of Industries with Market Power” doi
  10. (2001). Estimating Tax Incidence, Market Power and Market Conduct: The European Cigarette Industry” doi
  11. (2005). Exploiting Buyer Power: Lessons from the
  12. (2001). Food Processing and Distribution: An Industrial Organisation Approach” doi
  13. (2004). Imperfect Price Transmission: Is Market Power Really to doi
  14. (2004). Milk Prices in the United Kingdom” Ninth Report of Session 2003-04, Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, The Stationery Office,
  15. (2007). Modelling Dynamic Systems - PcGive 12: Volume II,
  16. (1998). Processing Technology, Market Structure and Price Transmission”, doi
  17. (1999). Quantitative Techniques in Competition Analysis, A report prepared for the Office of Fair Trading by Legg Ltd, Office of Fair Trading Research Paper 17,
  18. (2008). Report on the Market Investigation of the Supply of Groceries in the United Kingdom,
  19. (2007). Research on Suppliers to the UK Grocery Market. A Report to the Competition Commission”
  20. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Co-integrating Vectors”,
  21. (2000). Testing for the Cointegrating Rank of a VAR Process with an Intercept”, doi
  22. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root”, doi
  23. (2006). The Cointegrated VAR Model: Methodology and Applications
  24. (2004). The Food Supply Chain and Innovation: a Case Study of Potatoes, The Centre For Business Relationships, Accountability,
  25. (1993). Time Series Models, Second edition, doi
  26. (1980). Tomatoes, Technology and Oligopsony," doi
  27. (1998). Unit Roots, Cointegration and Structural Change, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.