Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Fairness on the day after tomorrow: justice, reciprocity and global climate change\ud

By Edward Page


Climate change raises important questions of global distributive justice, which can be defined as the issue of how benefits and burdens should be distributed within and between generations. This article addresses two conceptual issues that underpin the relationship between climate change and the part of distributive justice concerned with the entitlements of future persons. The first is the role of reciprocity, conceived either as mutual advantage or fair play, in the allocation of distributive entitlements between generations. The second is the extent to which theories of 'justice as reciprocity' can ground duties of intergenerational justice that underpin radical policies to manage the causes and impacts of global climate change. I argue that theories of justice as fair reciprocity generate significant duties of environmental conservation, despite these duties not being owed directly to the not-yet-born

Topics: HB
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). 4 Speech to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, doi
  2. (2002). 5 Former Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, for example, articulated this position forcefully at the 2002 UN climate change conference in Delhi. See BBC Online, ‘India rejects climate change pressure’,
  3. (1971). A Theory of Justice. doi
  4. (2006). An Overview of ‘Dangerous Climate Change’, in H.J. Schellnhuber et al. (eds) Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change. Cambridge: doi
  5. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. doi
  6. (2005). Atmospheric CO2 records from sites in the SIO air sampling network’, doi
  7. (2006). Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change. Cambridge: doi
  8. (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge: doi
  9. (2006). Climate Change, Justice, and Future Generations. doi
  10. (2004). Climate Change’, in B. Lomborg (ed), Global Crises, Global Solutions. Cambridge: doi
  11. (2003). Climate’, doi
  12. (2001). Costing Methodologies’,
  13. (1992). Counting the Cost of Global Warming. doi
  14. (2002). Dead Heat: Global Justice and Global Warming. doi
  15. (2003). Defending Justice as Reciprocity: An Essay on Social Policy and Political Philosophy. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen.
  16. (1995). Ecology, Politics and Policy. doi
  17. (1997). Egalitarianism and the Undeserving Poor’, doi
  18. (1996). Equity and Social Considerations’, in James Bruce et al (eds) Climate change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge:
  19. (2003). Ethics, Public Policy, Global Warming’, doi
  20. (2006). Fair Adaptation to Climate Change’, Ecological Economics, doi
  21. (1992). Genethics. doi
  22. (2004). Global Warming: More Common Than Tragic’, doi
  23. (2001). Human Health’, in J.J. McCarthy et al. (eds) (2001) Climate Change
  24. (2001). Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge: doi
  25. (2004). International Climate Efforts Beyond 2012: A Survey of Approaches.
  26. (1996). Intertemporal Equity, Discounting, and Economic Efficiency’, in J. Bruce et al (eds) Climate change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge:
  27. (1992). Is There a Generational Contract?’ in P. Laslett and J.S. Fishkin (eds) Justice Between Age Groups and Generations. New Haven: doi
  28. (1995). Justice as Impartiality. doi
  29. (1990). Justice as Reciprocity Versus Subject-Centred Justice’,
  30. (2005). Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. doi
  31. (2001). Justice, Posterity and the Environment. doi
  32. (1981). Laslett,
  33. (1997). Liberal equality, exploitation, and the case for an unconditional basic income’, doi
  34. (1995). Moral Free-riding’, doi
  35. (1979). Moral Principles and Political Obligations. doi
  36. (2001). New Ethics for Old? Or, How (Not) to Think About Future Generations’, doi
  37. (1978). Obligations to Posterity’, in R.I. Sikora and B.M. Barry (eds) Obligations to Future Generations (Philadelphia:
  38. (2002). One World. doi
  39. (2001). Overview of Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability to Climate Change’,
  40. (1999). Political Theory and International Relations. doi
  41. (1985). Protecting the Vulnerable. doi
  42. (2005). Reciprocity, doi
  43. (1968). Reflections on the Revolution in France. doi
  44. (2001). Setting the Stage: Climate Change and Sustainable Development’, doi
  45. (2007). Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge: doi
  46. (1992). The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation. doi
  47. (1981). The Rights of Past and Future Persons’, in E. Partridge, Responsibilities to Future Generations.
  48. (2004). The Scientific Consensus on doi
  49. (2001). The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. Cambridge: doi
  50. (2001). The Social Construction of Talent: A Defence of Justice as Reciprocity’, doi
  51. (1989). Theories of Justice. Hemel
  52. (1993). Thinking for Tomorrow’, doi
  53. (2006). Towards Justice in Adaptation to Climate Change’, doi
  54. (1995). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. doi
  55. (2001). What about reciprocity?’, in
  56. (2003). Who Can Be wronged?’,
  57. (1995). Why Posterity Matters. doi
  58. (2002). World Poverty and Human Rights. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.