Location of Repository

Not quite the 'Great Britain of the Far East': Japan's security, the US-Japan alliance and the 'war on terror' in East Asia

By Christopher W. Hughes

Abstract

Japan, in responding to US expectations for support in the 'war on terror', has displayed a degree of strategic convergence on global security objectives, thus prompting policy-makers and observers to dub it the 'Great Britain of the Far East'. This article argues, however, that Japan is far from assuming this role. For Japan, the 'war on terror' serves more as a political pretext for legitimating long-planned changes in military security policy that are often only marginally related to the US's anti-terrorism agenda. Instead, Japan has focused much more on using the terror threat rationale as a means to push forward its response to the regional and traditional security challenges of North Korea and China, even if at times it attempts to depict both as 'new security challenges' or as involving elements of counterterrorism. The final conclusion is that US military hegemony may be weakened by Japan's and the Asia-Pacific's potential divergence from the US global security agenda

Topics: DS, JQ
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1050

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2005a) ‘Japan: military modernization in search of a “normal” security role’,
  2. (2005). A multidimensional approach to security: the case of Japan’,
  3. and Akiko Fukushima (2004) ‘Japan-US security relations: toward “bilateralism-plus”?’,
  4. (2005). Foreign Affairs Japan (2005a) ‘Joint statement Security Consultative Committee’,
  5. (2005). Foreign Affairs Japan (2005b) ‘Security Consultative Committee document US-Japan alliance: transformation and realignment for the future’,
  6. (2005). Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto Formatted: Font color: Auto 26 Soeya, Yoshihide (2004) ‘Japan: normative constraints versus structural imperatives’,
  7. (1999). Japan’s economic power and security: Japan and North Korea, doi
  8. (2004). Japan’s security agenda: military, economic and environmental Dimensions, doi
  9. (2003). Koizumi Sōri Daijin Kisha kaiken Iraku mondai ni kansuru taiō ni tsuite’, http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/koizumispeech/2003/03/20kaiken.html, accessed 31
  10. (2003). Press conference by Prime Minister Junichirō Koizumi: The Basic Plan regarding the measures based on
  11. (2006). Security Consultative Committee document US-Japan alliance:
  12. (2005). Tanaka Hitoshi and Tahara Sōichirō (2005) Kokka to gaikō, Tokyo, Kōdansha Tanter,
  13. (2005). The Bush Doctrine and the Asian regional order: the perils and pitfalls of preemption’, in Mel Gurtov and Peter Van Ness (eds.) Confronting the Bush Doctrine: critical views from the Asia-Pacific (London: Routledge) doi
  14. (2004). The evolution of an actively pacifist nation’, Gaiko Forum,
  15. (2000). The United States and Japan: advancing toward a mature partnership, INSS special report (Washington DC:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.