Location of Repository

Japan's security policy, the US-Japan alliance, and the 'war on terror': incrementalism confirmed or radical leap? \ud

By Christopher W. Hughes

Abstract

Japan's response to the 'war on terror', in the form of the despatch of the JSDF to the Indian Ocean and Iraq, has given policy-makers and academic analysts grounds for believing that Japan is becoming a more assertive military power in support of its US ally. This article argues that JSDF despatch does not necessarily mark a divergence from Japan's previous security path over the short term. This is because its policy-makers have continued to hedge around commitments to the US through careful constitutional framing of JSDF missions and capabilities, allowing it opt-out clauses in future conflicts, and because it has also sought to pursue economic and alternative diplomatic policies in responding to terrorism and WMD proliferation in the Middle East. However, at the same this article argues that Japan has established important precedents for expanded JSDF missions in the 'war on terror', and that over the medium to longer terms these are likely to be applied to the bilateral context of the US-Japan security treaty in East Asia, and to push Japan towards becoming a more active military power through participation in US-led multinational 'coalitions of the willing' in East Asia and globally

Topics: DS, JQ
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1053

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. 1991-1992. ‘Japan and the new world order’, doi
  2. (2002). 9.11 tero kōgeki to Nihon no taiō’,
  3. (1997). American and Japanese strategic debates: the need for a new synthesis’,
  4. Asian-Pacific security, and the case for analytical eclecticism’, doi
  5. (1999). China, the U.S.-Japan alliance, and the security dilemma in doi
  6. (2002). International law and the war against terrorism’, doi
  7. (2002). Japan and the United States: the essential alliance’, doi
  8. (2002). Japan crosses the Rubicon’,
  9. (2001). Japan’s Afghan Expedition’,
  10. (1998). Japan’s Aum Shinrikyō, the changing nature of terrorism, and the post-Cold War security agenda’, Pacifica Review: Peace, doi
  11. (2002). Japan’s dual hedge’, doi
  12. (2000). Japan’s Navy: Politics and Paradox 1971-2000, doi
  13. (1993). Japan’s participation in UN peacekeeping operations: radical departure or predictable response?’, doi
  14. (2003). Japan’s response to terror: dispatching the SDF to the Arabian Sea’, doi
  15. (1991). Japan’s response to the Gulf crisis: an analytic overview’, doi
  16. (2003). Japan’s security policies during OEF and OIF: incremental reactions meet great expectations’,
  17. (1999). Mercantile realism and Japanese foreign policy’, doi
  18. (2001). Tero Taisaku Kanrenhō no shushi to pointo’, Jiyū Minshu,
  19. (2002). The Atlantic Council of the United States, The Mansfield Center for Pacific Affairs, The Research Institute for Peace and Security
  20. (2004). The evolution of an actively pacifist nation’,
  21. (1999). The evolution of military cooperation in the US-Japan alliance’,
  22. (1992). The Gulf War and the transformation of Japanese constitutional politics’, doi
  23. (1996). The North Korean crisis and Japanese security’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.