Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The environmental security debate and its significance for climate change

By Rita Floyd

Abstract

Policymakers, military strategists and academics all increasingly hail climate change as a security issue. This article revisits the (comparatively) long-standing “environmental security debate” and asks what lessons that earlier debate holds for the push towards making climate change a security issue. Two important claims are made. First, the emerging climate security debate is in many ways a re-run of the earlier dispute. It features many of the same proponents and many of the same disagreements. These disagreements concern, amongst other things, the nature of the threat, the referent object of security and the appropriate policy responses. Second, given its many different interpretations, from an environmentalist perspective, securitisation of the climate is not necessarily a positive development

Topics: JZ
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1083

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). 47 Ibid and Oxfam Briefing Note “Bio-fuelling poverty: Why the EU renewable-fuel target may be disastrous for poor people”,
  2. (2002). A Siachen Peace Park: The Solution to Half-Century of International Conflict”. doi
  3. (2003). An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for United States National Security”. Washington: Global Business Network,
  4. (2000). Armed Conflict and the Environment” In Environmental Conflict edited by doi
  5. Building Peace through Environmental Cooperation”.
  6. (1994). Closing Statement by Julian Simon”. In Scarcity or Abundance? A debate on the Environment, edited by
  7. (1997). Concepts of Security”. doi
  8. (2002). Conserving the Peace: Resources, Livelihoods and Security.
  9. (2003). Debating Violent Environments, Environmental Change and Security Project Report no. 9. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Center,
  10. (1998). Environment and Security: A New Trinity”. doi
  11. (1997). Environment and Security: Core Ideas and US Government Initiatives”. SAIS Review Winter-Spring doi
  12. (1989). Environment and Security”. doi
  13. (2002). Environmental Security. doi
  14. (1996). From Deep Black to Green? Military Monitoring of the Environment, Environmental Change and Security Program Report no. 2. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Center,
  15. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Centre for the Study of African Economies Working Paper. Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies,
  16. (1994). Green security or militarized environment: An introduction” In Green security or Militarised environment, edited by Jyrki Käkönen. doi
  17. (2007). http://esa.un.org/un-energy/index.htm UNEP, World Commission on Protected Areas, Global Transboundary Protected Areas Network, “Cordillera del Cóndor Transboundary Protected Area”.http://www.tbpa.net/case_01.htm
  18. (2008). Human Development Report: Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world, doi
  19. (1995). Is the Environment a National Security Issue?” doi
  20. (2007). National Security and the Threat of Climate Change.
  21. (1991). nd edition. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf,
  22. (1991). On the threshold: Environmental changes as causes of acute conflict”. doi
  23. (2004). Peace and Security – Two concepts and their relationship”. doi
  24. (2007). Peace Parks: Conservation and Conflict Resolution. doi
  25. (1983). Redefining Security”, doi
  26. (1989). Redefining Security”. doi
  27. (2002). Review of Peluso and Watts: Violent Environments, Environmental Change and Security Project Report no. 8. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Center,
  28. (2006). Scarcity, and Civil Strife in the Developing World. doi
  29. (2003). Securitisation: Taking stock of a research programme in Security Studies”.
  30. (1995). Securitization and Desecuritization”. In On Security, edited by R.D.
  31. (2003). Tactical Victories and Strategic Losses: The Evolution of Environmental Security. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis,
  32. (1990). The Case against Linking Environmental Degradation and National Security”. doi
  33. (2001). The Case of South Africa”. doi
  34. (2001). The Meaning of Environmental Security. doi
  35. (1988). The Military Sector vis-à-vis the Environment”. doi
  36. (1991). The military, the nation state and the environment”.
  37. (2004). The Next Steps for Environment, Population, and Security. Environmental Change and Security Project Report 10. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Center,
  38. (2001). The Skeptical Environmentalist. Cambridge: doi
  39. (2007). Towards a consequentialist evaluation of security: Bringing together the Copenhagen School and the Welsh School of Security Studies”. doi
  40. (2003). Violent Environments: Responses, Environmental Change and Security Project Report no. 9. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Center,
  41. (2001). Violent Environments”. In Violent Environments, doi
  42. (1998). Writing Security. 2 nd edition.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.