Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Are Central Banks following a linear or nonlinear (augmented) Taylor rule?

By Vítor Manuel Alves Castro


The Taylor rule establishes a simple linear relation between the interest rate, inflation and output gap. However, this relation may not be so simple. To get a deeper understanding of central banks’ behaviour, this paper asks whether central banks are indeed following a linear Taylor rule or, instead, a nonlinear rule. At the same time, it also analyses whether that rule can be augmented with a financial conditions index containing information from some asset prices and financial variables. A forward-looking monetary policy reaction function is employed in the estimation of the linear and nonlinear models. A smooth transition model is used to estimate the nonlinear rule.\ud The results indicate that the European Central Bank and the Bank of England tend to follow a nonlinear Taylor rule, but not the Federal Reserve of the United States. In particular, those two central banks tend to react to inflation only when inflation is above or outside their targets. Moreover, our evidence suggests that the European Central Bank is targeting financial conditions, contrary to the other two central banks. This lack of attention to the financial conditions might have made the United States and the United Kingdom more vulnerable to the recent credit crunch than the Eurozone

Topics: HG
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2007a). The Fed’s monetary policy rule and US inflation: the case of asymmetric preferences. doi
  2. (2007b). The monetary policy of the European Central Bank. doi
  3. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of non-stationary time series and the business cycle. doi
  4. (2004). André and Radu Vranceanu doi
  5. (2001). Are economic time series asymmetric over the business cycle? doi
  6. (2005). Are monetary policy reaction functions asymmetric? The role of nonlinearity in the Phillips curve. doi
  7. (2000). Asset Prices and Central Bank Policy. doi
  8. (2002). Asset prices and the conduct of monetary policy. doi
  9. (2002). Asset prices, financial and monetary stability: Exploring the nexus. Bank for International Settlements Working Papers, doi
  10. (2001). Asset prices, financial conditions, and the transmission of monetary policy. Paper presented at the conference on Asset Prices, Exchange Rates and Monetary Policy, doi
  11. (2000). Asymmetries in monetary policy: Evidence for four central banks.
  12. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. doi
  13. (2005). Do central banks act asymmetrically? Empirical evidence from the ECB and the Bank of England. doi
  14. (2007). Do central banks respond to exchange rate movements? A structural investigation. doi
  15. (2007). Does the Federal Reserve follow a non-linear Taylor rule?
  16. (2002). Eric Schaling doi
  17. (2006). Estimating Central Banks’ preferences from a timevarying empirical reaction function. doi
  18. (2005). Financial Condition Index and interest rate settings: a comparative analysis. Istituto di Studi Economici Working Paper 8.2005. Università degli studi di Napoli “Parthenope”.
  19. (2006). Five years of single European monetary policy in practice: Is the ECB rule-based? doi
  20. (2008). In-sample and out-of-sample properties of linear and nonlinear Taylor rules. doi
  21. (1997). Inflation forecast targeting: Implementing and monitoring inflation targets. doi
  22. (2003). Inflation target under asymmetric preferences. doi
  23. (2006). Interest rate setting and inflation targeting: Evidence of a nonlinear Taylor rule for the United Kingdom. doi
  24. (2002). Is there an asymmetric effect of monetary policy over time? A Bayesian analysis using Austrian data. doi
  25. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. doi
  26. (1998). Modeling economic relationships with smooth transition regressions. In
  27. (2005). Modelling monetary policy: Inflation targeting in practice. doi
  28. (1993). Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships. doi
  29. (1999). Monetary policy and asset prices volatility. doi
  30. (2002). Monetary policy and asset prices: Does ‘benign neglect’ make sense? doi
  31. (2006). Monetary policy and financial stability: What role for futures market? doi
  32. (2000). Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory. doi
  33. (2001). Monetary policy rules based on real-time data. doi
  34. (1998). Monetary policy rules in practice: Some international evidence. doi
  35. (2004). Monetary policy rules, asset prices, and Exchange rates.
  36. (2000). Nonlinear economic policies: Pitfalls in the Lucas critique empirical counterpart.
  37. (2003). Optimal discretionary monetary policy in a model of asymmetric central bank preferences. doi
  38. (1999). Policy rules for inflation targeting. In doi
  39. (2001). Should Central Banks respond to movements in asset prices? doi
  40. (2002). Smooth transition autoregressive models: A survey of recent developments. doi
  41. (2005). The Fed’s reaction to asset prices.
  42. (2002). The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, doi
  43. (1999). The science of monetary policy: A new Keynesian perspective. doi
  44. (2007). Using Taylor rules to understand the ECB monetary policy. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.